A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol ER Compared With Placebo in Patients With Chronic, Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT01041859

Last Updated: 2013-09-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

460 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of orally administered tapentadol extended release (ER) at dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain due to chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who tolerated tapentadol (ER) and have an initial treatment effect (pain improvement) after a 3-week, open-label titration period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized-withdrawal (only patients that have an initial response to tapentadol are assigned to either tapentadol or placebo), placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of orally administered tapentadol, using the extended release tamper-resistant formulation (TRF), at dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe pain due to chronic, painful DPN. The study consists of 1) an open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention) phase, including a 13-day screening period, a 5-day washout period (where patients are to stop taking their pain medication), a 3-day pre-titration pain-intensity evaluation period (where patients will record their pain intensity twice daily in the morning and evening), and a 3-week, open-label titration period (all patients receive tapentadol study drug), 2) a 12-week, double-blind (neither physician nor patient knows the name of the assigned drug) maintenance phase, and 3) a posttreatment phase of approximately 10 to 14 days. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of orally administered tapentadol ER versus placebo in reducing patients' pain intensity. The pain intensity will be assessed by comparing the baseline pain level to the level at week 12 of the maintenance phase. The total duration of study drug treatment for each patient will be approximately 15 weeks. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), standardized neurologic examinations, and monitoring of adverse events. Patients will be titrated on tapentadol ER from a starting dose of 50 mg twice daily to the patient's optimal dose ranging between 100 mg and 250 mg twice a day, or placebo. All doses of study medication will be taken orally with approximately 120 ml of water with or without food for a maximum timeframe of 15 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Painful Polyneuropathy Peripheral neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tapentadol Extended Release (ER)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tapentadol extended release (ER)

Intervention Type DRUG

Type= range, unit= mg, number= 100 to 250, form= tablet, route= oral use. Tapentadol ER optimal dose ranging between 100 mg and 250 mg twice daily for 15 weeks.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Form= tablet, route= oral use. Matching placebo twice daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tapentadol extended release (ER)

Type= range, unit= mg, number= 100 to 250, form= tablet, route= oral use. Tapentadol ER optimal dose ranging between 100 mg and 250 mg twice daily for 15 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Form= tablet, route= oral use. Matching placebo twice daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
* Diagnosis must include pain plus reduction or absence of pin sensibility and/or vibration sensibility on Total Neuropathy Score - Nurse (TNSn) examination in lower and/or upper extremities at screening
* The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study
* Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
* Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to \<=160mg of oral morphine

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant history of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia)
* History of moderate to severe hepatic impairment
* Severely impaired renal function
* Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
* Clinically significant cardiac disease
* History of seizure disorder or epilepsy
* History of any other clinically significant disease that in the investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient safety during study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GrĂ¼nenthal GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Redding, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Eagle, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Owings Mills, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Cedarhurst, New York, United States

Site Status

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Valley Stream, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bulverde, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Schertz, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Puerto Rico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R331333PAI3027

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KF56

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR016051

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id