Combination Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Versus Sulfasalazine in Inflammatory Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT01040195

Last Updated: 2013-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Till now no drug has been conclusively shown to affect the natural course of the inflammatory back ache in seronegative spondylarthropathies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) have been the main stay of treatment for these diseases for long. Despite providing good pain relief, they are largely ineffective in altering the natural course of these diseases. However, very often, in spite of therapy, pain and discomfort continues in these patients with recurrent exacerbations. Other drugs have been tried in these patients.

The DMARDS (Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs) are a group of drugs which have come into prominence following their remarkable efficacy in the management of Rheumatoid Arthritis, another chronic inflammatory autoimmune arthritis. The major drugs which come in this group are Methotrexate, Sulfasalazine, Hydroxychloroquine and Leflunomide. Of these drugs, the most well studied drug in Spondylarthropathy is Sulfasalazine. Trials have shown variable results of response of spondyloarthropathy to sulfasalazine. The other major DMARD tried is methotrexate. Though large well controlled trials are lacking, the available data on its efficacy in spondyloarthropathy has not been favorable. Leflunomide, the other major DMARD has also fared poorly in a controlled trial in ankylosing spondylitis. There is at present inadequate data regarding the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine.

The discovery of anti TNF-α have been the major breakthrough in the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and Spondyloarthropathies (SpA). These drugs, besides providing symptomatic improvement, also produce improvement in the indices of disease activity as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Assessment of Spondylo-Arthritis International Society (ASAS). Besides, the enormous cost, incurred at a rate of about Rs 700,000/- per annum, put it out of reach of the majority of affected population. Add to these is the increased risk of tuberculosis and fungal infections, a major problem in India.

In this background there is severe and pressing need for alternate safe and effective drugs in the management of these diseases. It is here that the combination DMARD therapy assumes importance as a potential safe and cheaper alternative.

We aim to assess the efficacy of combination DMARD therapy in patients with early inflammatory chronic backache in patients with sero negative spondyloarthropathies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spondyloarthropathies SpA

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combination DMARD

All patients included in the study, will be started on Sulfasalazine 1 gm once daily and in the absence of side effects increased to 2gm daily. All patients will also receive folic acid 5 mg thrice weekly. At the end of four weeks the patients will be reassessed with baseline hemogram, SGPT, SGOT and serum Creatinine. In the absence of any contraindication, patients will be randomized into two groups Group 1 to receive Combination Disease Modifying therapy with Sulfasalazine, Methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Patient will be started on Methotrexate/placebo at 10 mg once weekly and increased every week by 2.5 mg to maximum dose of 20 mg per week in the absence of side effects. These patients will also be started on Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Methotrexate, Hydroxychloroquine

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate will be prepared as unmarked tablets of 2.5 mg strength each and Hydroxychloroquine as unmarked tablet of 200 mg strength. Patients will be started on Methotrexate/placebo at 10 mg once weekly and increased every week by 2.5 mg to maximum dose of 20 mg per week in the absence of side effects. These patients will also be started on Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day or placebo.

Placebo

All patients included in the study, will be started on Sulfasalazine 1 gm once daily and in the absence of side effects increased to 2gm daily All patients will also receive folic acid 5 mg twice weekly. At the end of four weeks the patients will be reassessed with baseline hemogram, SGPT, SGOT and serum Creatinine. Group 2 patients will receive Sulfasalazine and placebo for methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Identical placebos (for methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine)will be prepared and prescribed in identical fashion as the methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine in the combination DMARD arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methotrexate, Hydroxychloroquine

Methotrexate will be prepared as unmarked tablets of 2.5 mg strength each and Hydroxychloroquine as unmarked tablet of 200 mg strength. Patients will be started on Methotrexate/placebo at 10 mg once weekly and increased every week by 2.5 mg to maximum dose of 20 mg per week in the absence of side effects. These patients will also be started on Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day or placebo.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Identical placebos (for methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine)will be prepared and prescribed in identical fashion as the methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine in the combination DMARD arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Folitrax HCQS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who fulfilled criteria for the diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis (Modified New York Criteria) or undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (UspA) (Amor criteria) and are within 8 years of disease onset with:
* Inflammatory back Pain of more than 6 months
* BASDAI ≥4 or EMS ≥45 minutes
* Have failed maximum dose of at least one NSAID for 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with renal diseases
* patients with hepatic diseases
* Patients with severe uncorrected anemia (Hb\<7gm)
* Patients previously received full dose of sulfasalazine and/or methotrexate with inadequate relief
* Pregnant or lactating females
* Malignancy or active infection
* Patient requiring and affording biologicals
* Patients who have received steroids in the past 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Vikas Agarwal

Additional Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vikas Agarwal, MD, DM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SGPGIMS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A-08:PGI/DM/IEC/45/7.2.2009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.