Chitosan Dressings to Facilitate Safe Effective Debridement of Chronic Wounds & Minimize Wound Bacterial Re-colonization
NCT ID: NCT01035944
Last Updated: 2014-07-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare the Hemostatic Effectiveness of Chitosan Gauze With Traditional Gauze on Open Wound on 10 Participants.
NCT03907111
The Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Gel Dressing in Preventing Surgical Drain Site Infection
NCT04656145
Healthy Tissue Preservation During Wound Debridement by Using Debritom+ Micro Water Jet Technology
NCT04514783
Efficacy and Safety of the Investigational Device, SurgiShield Anti-Adhesion Barrier Gel
NCT01895933
Activated Carbon Interphase Effect on Surgical Incisions vs.Two Common Wound Dressings
NCT04038671
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. To demonstrate that debridements performed using HemCon dressings at the bedside can be performed safely without excessive bleeding in eligible patients
2. To compare the levels of bacterial load between debrided wounds treated with HemCon dressings and debrided wounds treated with gauze and saline dressings at 2 days and 5 days after debridement
Secondary objectives: The following secondary objectives will be achieved by this study:
1. To determine the cost efficacy, if any, between wounds debrided at the bedside with HemCon dressings and wounds debrided in the operating room setting
2. To determine the cost efficacy, if any, between wounds debrided in the operating room where hemostasis is achieved with a HemCon dressing and between debrided wounds where hemostasis is achieved with traditional cauterization methods.
3. To compare comfort levels in patients treated with HemCon dressings as compared to traditional gauze dressings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HemCon Operating Room
The HemCon dressing is the intervention for the HemCon Operating Room arm. The first sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings in the operating room setting. 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.
HemCon Dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze; chitosan-based.
Perform debridement of chronic wounds using HemCon chitosan-based dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze both at bedside and in the Operating Room (OR) settings. Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
Control Operating Room
The first sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings in the operating room setting. 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.
Gauze and saline dressings.
Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
HemCon Bedside
The intervention for the HemCon Beside arm is the HemCon Dressing. The other sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings compared to control dressings in bedside debridement. In this sub-study, 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.
HemCon Dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze; chitosan-based.
Perform debridement of chronic wounds using HemCon chitosan-based dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze both at bedside and in the Operating Room (OR) settings. Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
Control Bedside.
The other sub-study will evaluate the use of HemCon dressings compared to control dressings in bedside debridement. In this sub-study, 20 patients will be treated with HemCon dressings following a debridement, and 20 patients will be treated with gauze dressings following a debridement.
Gauze and saline dressings.
Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HemCon Dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze; chitosan-based.
Perform debridement of chronic wounds using HemCon chitosan-based dressings and HemCon ChitoGauze both at bedside and in the Operating Room (OR) settings. Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
Gauze and saline dressings.
Control for both settings will be gauze and saline dressings.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a wound on their body with an eschar and/or significant slough present
* Documented laboratory studies and coagulation profiles prior to the debridement (including hematocrit, hemoglobin, white blood count, total lymphocyte count, albumin, pre-albumin, HbA1C in patients with diabetes)
* Subjects with a hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL must have one unit of blood typed and cross matched prior to the debridement; all other subjects must have an active type and screen performed prior to the debridement procedure.
* Subjects must be willing to consent to a blood transfusion in the rare event that a transfusion is necessary.
* Must be expected to be inpatients for at least 5 days following debridement, to enable controlled dressing changes by the service.
* Female subjects of childbearing age must not be pregnant, and must consent to utilize an appropriate method of contraception during the course of the study.
For subjects that are to undergo a debridement in the operating room:
* Subjects must be sensate or have wounds that are sufficiently large to warrant a debridement in the OR
* Wounds must require more than a simple eschar removal, or must be extensive enough that an operating room debridement would be more appropriate.
* Subjects must be candidates for regional or general anesthesia, unless the wound occurs in an insensate body part (for example, a pressure sore in a paraplegic or quadriplegic patient, or a diabetic foot ulcer in a patient with a dense diabetic polyneuropathy).
For subjects that are to undergo a debridement in the bedside setting:
* The part of the wound that is to be debrided must be mostly an eschar and necrotic tissue which is not likely to have significant bleeding.
* Subjects must be insensate, or the wound must be less than 50 cm2 such that the use of local anesthesia in the wound can be undertaken.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not candidates for or refuse blood transfusions
* Unable to provide written informed consent
* Subjects with sensitivity to chitosan or the gauze dressings used in this study, or any local anesthetic needed for a debridement
* Subjects who are in the intensive care unit
* Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may not complete the study for any reason.
* Have grossly infected wounds that may reasonably be expected to require multiple debridement procedures prior to clearance of bacteria and nonviable tissue from the wound.
* For wounds situated in the lower extremity, leg must have either palpable pulses or else an ABI \> 0.4
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
HemCon Medical Technologies, Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert D. Galiano, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Division of Plastic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HC-NU-2009-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.