Comparing Follow-Up Schedules in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IB or Stage II Melanoma

NCT ID: NCT01018004

Last Updated: 2013-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

178 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Gathering information over time from follow-up visits may help doctors plan the best follow-up schedule. It is not yet known which follow-up schedule is more effective in improving patient quality of life.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is comparing follow-up schedules to see how well they work in patients with newly diagnosed stage IB or stage II melanoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* To determine the difference between conventional versus experimental follow-up schedules, in terms of patient well-being, expressed health-related quality of life, level of anxiety, and satisfaction with the follow-up schedule in patients with newly diagnosed stage IB or II cutaneous melanoma.
* To determine the ability of these schedules to detect recurrences and second primary melanomas in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to AJCC stage (I vs II). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 follow-up arms.

* Arm I (experimental follow-up schedule): Patients undergo a thorough history and physical examination periodically for 5 years. Patients are followed up according to the experimental schedule:

* For stage IB disease: Patients are followed up annually for 5 years.
* For stage IIA disease: Patients are followed up biannually for years 1 and 2 and annually for years 3, 4, and 5.
* For stage IIB or IIC disease: Patients are followed up every 4 months during years 1 and 2, every 6 months during year 3, and annually during years 4 and 5.
* Arm II: (conventional follow-up schedule): Patients undergo a thorough history and physical examination periodically for 5 years. Patients are followed up according to the conventional schedule:

* For all stage disease: Patients are followed up every 3 months for year 1, every 4 months for year 2, and every 6 months for years 3-5.

In both arms, patient well-being is measured at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after primary diagnosis, using the following questionnaires: the health-related quality of life questionnaire (RAND-36), the anxiety questionnaire (STAI version DY-1 \[state\] and DY-2 \[trait\]), the Cancer Worry Scale, and Follow-up Satisfaction questionnaire, and the self-designed specific questions regarding self-examination and follow-up satisfaction.

All patients are instructed at primary diagnosis and receive the Melanoma-Patient-Education-Package (MPEP), which consists of information on melanoma (KWF folder "melanoma") and additional instruction on self-examination. Data on type of recurrence (locoregional versus distant), the person detecting the recurrence, progression of recurrence at time of detection, the way the recurrence was detected (e.g., self-examination, accidentally, or at follow-up by physical examination or imaging) and information regarding treatment and further follow-up are collected at each follow-up visit and the outcomes are compared in both groups. Outcomes of independent questionnaires are also compared in both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma (Skin)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

stage IB melanoma stage II melanoma

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

follow-up care

Intervention Type OTHER

questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

quality-of-life assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Pathologically confirmed newly diagnosed cutaneous melanoma

* AJCC stage IB or II disease
* Received curative treatment
* Completed the first set of questionnaires

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* Able to speak and understand Dutch or English
* Must be able to participate in the follow-up schedule (e.g., permanently living in the Netherlands)
* No known second malignancy

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Harald J. Hoekstra, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Groningen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Enschede, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden - Zuid

Leeuwarden, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Isala Klinieken - locatie Weezenlanden

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Contact Person

Role: primary

Contact Person

Role: primary

Contact Person

Role: primary

Contact Person

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMCG-MELFO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20988

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000659310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id