A Study to Compare Quality of Life and Compliance in Patients Receiving High-dose Interferon Versus Pegylated Interferon in Patients With Surgically Resected Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT01986712
Last Updated: 2025-02-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-12-31
2019-09-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Interferon Alfa-2b (Intron A®) for the Adjuvant Treatment of Malignant Melanoma (Study P04083)
NCT00749684
High-Dose Interferon Alfa in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Melanoma
NCT00003641
Evaluation of Interferon-Lovastatin Therapy for Malignant Melanoma
NCT00963664
High-Dose or Low-Dose Interferon Alfa Compared With No Further Therapy Following Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage III Melanoma
NCT00002763
Quality of Life and Psychological Well-being in Patients With Malignant Melanoma
NCT00963261
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
• To evaluate compliance with the administration of standard HDI versus PEG IFN for patients with melanoma in need of adjuvant therapy
The secondary objectives of this study are:
* To compare the convenience and satisfaction with chemotherapy for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN using a chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction questionnaire (CCSQ) and to evaluate the treatment-related side effects that may impact the patient's HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy of Biologic Response Modifier (FACT BRM)
* To assess the frequency of Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) for patients on standard HDI versus PEG IFN
* To examine reasons for patients' choice of treatment with HDI versus PEG IFN, for those cases in which patients are presented with a choice of either treatment option
* To assess Health Resource Utilization on both arms of the study
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intron A, HDI
High-dose interferon alfa (Intron A, HDI)
No interventions assigned to this group
Sylatron
Pegylated alfa-interferon 2b (Sylatron, PEG IFN)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has had surgically resected melanoma and plans to receive adjuvant therapy with HDI or PEG IFN
* Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
* Patient is willing to comply with all study requirements
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient has a history of anaphylaxis due to any interferon alpha product
* Patient has autoimmune hepatitis
* Patient has decompensated liver disease (Child-Pugh score\>6 ( Class B and C)
* Patient has a history of neuropsychiatric disorder (including depression) that, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair the patient's ability to successfully complete treatment or protocol-related requirements
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neil Belman
Dr. Neil Belman
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neil Belman, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network, Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Moffit Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Merck MISP 50422
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.