Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® System
NCT ID: NCT01011816
Last Updated: 2014-05-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® Disc Augmentation System: A Pilot Study
NCT00693784
Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT01263054
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Viable Placental Tissue Extract in Subjects With One or Two Level, Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
NCT02379689
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of IDCT, a Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
NCT03347708
Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System
NCT00529997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Symptomatic IDD is defined as a painful disruption of the internal architecture of a lumbar intervertebral disc, which appears as fissures, cracks or tears within the internal structures of the disc. Pain arising from a lumbar disc may not only be perceived as pain located in the low back (axial pain) but also as somatic referred pain involving the posterior hips, buttocks, lateral hips, groin, or posterior thighs.
The diagnosis of symptomatic IDD cannot currently be made on the basis of imaging studies, physical examination, or symptoms alone, and is best established with meticulously conducted disc provocation studies (provocation discography) that include pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent normal disc.
This treatment and study are not designed for patients exhibiting other potential sources of chronic low back pain such as more advanced degenerative disc disease with significant loss of disc height (\>33%), spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis (see Eligibility Criteria).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BIOSTAT BIOLOGX
One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc
BIOSTAT BIOLOGX
One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device
Saline
One injection of up to 4 mL of saline solution into a single lumbar intervertebral disc
Saline
One injection of up to 4 mL of saline using the Biostat Delivery Device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BIOSTAT BIOLOGX
One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device
Saline
One injection of up to 4 mL of saline using the Biostat Delivery Device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Voluntarily signs the subject informed consent form and agrees to the release of medical information for purposes of this study (HIPAA authorization).
* Physically and mentally able to comply with the protocol, including ability to read and complete required forms, and willing and able to adhere to the follow-up requirements of the protocol.
* Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months.
* Pretreatment baseline low back pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale.
* Pretreatment baseline Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score of at least 9 on the 24-point questionnaire.
* Leg pain, if present, is of nonradicular origin, i.e., not due to stimulation of nerve roots or dorsal root ganglion of a spinal nerve by compressive forces.
* Leg pain, if present, does not extend below the knee and is no greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale. If bilateral leg pain, the worst leg pain is no greater than 50% of low back pain.
* Low back pain unresponsive to at least 3 months of nonoperative care, which may include bed rest, antiinflammatory and analgesic medications, chiropractic manipulations, acupuncture, massage, physical therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise program.
* Diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure indicates no facet joint involvement.
* Diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar (L1-L2 - L5-S1) internal disc disruption (IDD), which requires confirmation of discogenic pain at one or two contiguous levels through positive provocation discography performed between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure using pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent nonpainful disc. The disc provocation studies must precisely demonstrate concordant pain (\<50 psi above opening pressure) and must demonstrate a fissure(s) in the outer one-third of the posterior or lateral anulus.
Exclusion Criteria
* Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms.
* Current infection or prior history of spinal infection (e.g., discitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess) or an active systemic infection.
* Previous lumbar spine surgery.
* Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture.
* Disc bulge/protrusion or focal herniation at the symptomatic level(s) \> 4 mm.
* Presence of disc extrusion or sequestration.
* Leg pain is greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale.
* Leg pain that extends below the knee.
* Lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis at the affected level(s) resulting in significant spinal nerve root compression (effacement of the majority of periganglion fat and loss of CSF signal around the nerve rootlets).
* Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis or absolute sagittal vertebral canal diameter \< 9mm.
* Loss of disc space height at the symptomatic level(s) greater than one-third of an adjacent normal disc (or of the expected height in the case of an L5-S1 disc).
* Spondylolisthesis (\> Grade 1) with or without spondylolysis at the symptomatic level(s).
* Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy.
* Dynamic instability at the symptomatic level(s) on lumbar flexion-extension radiographs indicated by \>4.5 mm of translation or angular motion \>15° at L1-L2, L2-L3, or L3-L4; \>20° at L4-L5; or \>25° at L5-S1.
* Diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection indicate facet joint involvement.
* Diagnostic sacroiliac injection indicates sacroiliac joint involvement for those patients with pain in the sacral region.
* Sustained relief (\>3 months) of low back pain obtained with epidural injection of corticosteroids.
* Symptomatic involvement of more than two lumbar disc levels determined from discography.
* Neurological examination shows findings of radiculopathy or a significant underlying neurological condition (motor strength \<4; sensory assessment abnormal; or reflexes absent or hyperactive with clonus).
* Prior thermal intradiscal procedure (e.g., intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation).
* Any lumbar intradiscal injection procedure other than discography (e.g., injection of corticosteroids, methylene blue, dextrose, or glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate).
* Significant systemic disease, including unstable angina, autoimmune disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and muscular dystrophy.
* Congenital or acquired coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia; or currently taking anticoagulant, antineoplastic, antiplatelet, or thrombocytopenia-inducing medications; or undergoing radiation therapy.
* History of unexplained, easy, or persistent bruising or bleeding, bleeding from the gums, or bleeding problems experienced in previous surgical procedures.
* Aspirin or aspirin-containing medication taken ≤ 7 days prior to the procedure.
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity or allergy to drugs or components of the fibrin sealant (fibrinogen, thrombin, aprotinin, CaCl2) used in the procedure.
* History of, or current psychiatric or psychological condition, or substance or alcohol abuse that would potentially interfere with the subject's participation in the study.
* Ongoing or previous participation in another drug or device clinical study within the previous 2 months.
* Subject known to be pregnant or nursing at time of enrollment or with plans to become pregnant within the planned length of follow-up.
* Body habitus precludes adequate fluoroscopic visualization for the procedure or the procedure is physically impossible using the device.
* Concomitant conditions requiring daily oral steroid use for more than 30 days in the preceding 90 days.
* Pending litigation against a health care professional, except where required by the insurer as a condition of coverage, personal injury compensation or litigation claims.
* Prisoner or active military personnel who would not be available for follow-up.
* Presence of ferromagnetic implants that would disallow MRI of the symptomatic disc(s).
* Active or pending workers' compensation claims.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Spinal Restoration, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin J Pauza, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Spine Specialists PA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
HOPE Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Pain Control Associates of San Diego
Chula Vista, California, United States
Napa Pain Institute
Napa, California, United States
California Spine Diagnostics
San Francisco, California, United States
The Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
The Pain Institute, Inc
Merritt Island, Florida, United States
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
The Spine Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Medical Advanced Pain Specialists Applied Research Center
Edina, Minnesota, United States
NewSouth NeuroSpine Pain Center
Flowood, Mississippi, United States
OrthoCarolina Spine Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
OrthoNeuro, Inc.
New Albany, Ohio, United States
Allegheny Pain Management
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists
York, Pennsylvania, United States
Spine Specialists PA
Tyler, Texas, United States
Virginia Spine Research Institute
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Advanced Pain Management
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Bellingham Spine Pain Specialists PS
Bellingham, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yin W, Pauza K, Olan WJ, Doerzbacher JF, Thorne KJ. Intradiscal injection of fibrin sealant for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar internal disc disruption: results of a prospective multicenter pilot study with 24-month follow-up. Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):16-31. doi: 10.1111/pme.12249. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Buser Z, Keulling F, Jane L, Liebenberg E, Tang J, Thorne K, Coughlin D, Lotz J. Fibrin injection stimulates early disc healing in the porcine model [NASS Abstract 199]. Spine Journal 9:105S, 2009.
Buser Z, Kuelling F, Liu J, Liebenberg E, Thorne KJ, Coughlin D, Lotz JC. Biological and biomechanical effects of fibrin injection into porcine intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):E1201-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820566b2.
Pauza K, Yin W, Olan W, Doerzbacher JF. BIOSTAT BIOLOGX(R) intradiscal fibrin sealant used for treatment of chronic low back pain caused by lumbar disc disruption: results of a 12 month, prospective multicenter pilot study. Spine Arthroplasty Society Meeting, April 27-30, 2010; New Orleans, LA. Abstract 248.
Yin W, Pauza K, Olan W, Doerzbacher JF. Long-term outcomes from a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption (IDE) pilot study of intradiscal fibrin sealant for the treatment of discogenic pain [ISIS Abstract]. Pain Medicine 12:1446-1447, 2011
Buser Z, Liu J, Thorne KJ, Coughlin D, Lotz JC. Inflammatory response of intervertebral disc cells is reduced by fibrin sealant scaffold in vitro. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014 Jan;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1002/term.1503. Epub 2012 May 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SR-BX01-2007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.