A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously

NCT ID: NCT00996177

Last Updated: 2014-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

657 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-06-30

Study Completion Date

2005-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a patient-controlled system to deliver fentanyl compared with a patient-controlled intravenous system to deliver morphine in the management of postoperative pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention) study to evaluate the clinical use, safety and ease of care of two patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) systems to deliver pain medication either through the skin or intravenously. The fentanyl hydrochloride PCA system, which delivers the medication through the skin, and morphine intravenous (IV)- PCA, which requires injection into a vein, are used for management of moderate to severe acute pain in postoperative patients who have undergone elective major abdominal or orthopedic surgery. These patients, who are expected to require postoperative pain relief with strong opioids for at least 24 hours, will control the delivery of medication for up to 3 days. Assessment of effectiveness include: patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent); Pain Intensity, measured on a visual numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst possible pain; Ease-of-Care questionnaires including Patient Ease-of-Care questionnaire, Nurse Ease-of-Care questionnaire, and Physical Therapist Ease-of-Care questionnaire; and, total number of doses delivered by patients in the fentanyl transdermal PCA or morphine IV PCA treatment groups. Safety evaluations include vital signs (pulse, blood pressure) and oxygen saturation, respiratory function, and the incidence of adverse events. The study hypothesis is that fentanyl transdermal PCA is not inferior to morphine IV PCA treatment in patient's global assessment of method of pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery. Transdermal PCA: 40 micrograms fentanyl per on-demand dose, each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses/hr for 24 hours (maximum of 80 doses, 3.2milligrams). Morphine IV PCA: morphine doses with a maximum of 20 milligrams per 2 hours for 24 hours (maximum 12 doses, 240 milligrams).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IONSYS

IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

Intervention Type DRUG

40 µg fentanyl on-demand (240µg/hr) or a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 mg) per day

Patient-Controlled Analgesia

IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

Intervention Type DRUG

20mg/2hr (240 mg during 24 hours)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

40 µg fentanyl on-demand (240µg/hr) or a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 mg) per day

Intervention Type DRUG

IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

20mg/2hr (240 mg during 24 hours)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) pre-operative physical status I, II, or III
* Patients expected to have moderate or severe pain after a major abdominal or orthopedic procedure
* Patients expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours postoperatively

Exclusion Criteria

* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, or to skin adhesives
* Known or suspected to be dependent on strong opioids or to have abused any drug substance or alcohol
* Severe respiratory symptoms
* Chronic pain disorder
* Pregnant or nursing women, or those lacking adequate contraception
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alza Corporation, DE, USA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen-Cilag International NV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen-Cilag International NV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Kÿbenhavn Nv N/A, , Denmark

Site Status

Kÿbenhavn Ÿ, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Ÿrhus C, , Denmark

Site Status

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kÿln, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköpng N/A, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

N/a N/a, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Denmark France Germany Ireland Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17519263 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FEN-PPA-401

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2004-001201-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR003943

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CO2 Monitoring Study
NCT02068274 COMPLETED
Nebulized Fentanyl in Healthy Volunteers
NCT06281951 RECRUITING PHASE1
Comparative Efficacy of 4 Oral Analgesics
NCT02455518 COMPLETED PHASE4
Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study
NCT04452344 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3