Ablative Fractional Lasers to Treat Peri-orbital Rhytides

NCT ID: NCT00990431

Last Updated: 2009-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-31

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ablative fractional lasers were introduced for treating facial rhytides in an attempt to achieve results comparable to traditional ablative resurfacing but with fewer side effects. However, there is conflicting evidence on how well this goal has generally been achieved as well as on the comparative value of fractional CO2 and Er:YAG lasers. The present study compares these modalities in a randomized controlled blinded split-face study design:

28 patients were enrolled and completed the entire study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single treatment on each side of the peri-orbital region, one with a fractional CO2 and one with a fractional Er:YAG laser. The evaluation included Fitzpatrick wrinkle score, profilometric measurement of wrinkle depth (both before and 3 months after treatment) as well as assessment of side effects and patient satisfaction (1, 3, 6 days and 3 months after treatment).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peri-orbital Rhytides

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Carbon dioxide laser treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The CO2 laser (Fraxel Re:pair, Solta Medical Inc., Hayward, CA) employs disposable tips with a diameter of 7 mm and 15 mm, the smaller being used for the peri-orbital region. The laser beam is delivered through multiple deflective and refractive elements and focused to a spot size of approximately 120 µm in diameter at incidence to the skin to deposit an array of laser beams across the surface. Pulse energy varies from 5 to 70 mJ and density from 5 to 70 %. The pulse duration is 10 msec. In the present study, patients received two passes at 15 mJ (1st pass) and 20 mJ (2nd pass), respectively, with a total density of 20 %.

Erbium:YAG laser treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fractional erbium:YAG laser treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Er:YAG laser used in this study has a fractional handpiece (MCL 30 Dermablate, Asclepion Laser Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany). By means of a microlens array the laser beam is divided into 13 x 13 small spots with 250 µm diameter each, spread over an area of 13 x 13 mm. A coverage of 5 % of the skin is achieved with a single pass. The pulse duration is 400 μsec. In this trial, we performed 4 passes (resulting in coverage of 20 % of the treated skin) with a total fluence of 60 J/cm² and pulse stacking (6 stacked pulses) to optimize thermal exposure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment

The CO2 laser (Fraxel Re:pair, Solta Medical Inc., Hayward, CA) employs disposable tips with a diameter of 7 mm and 15 mm, the smaller being used for the peri-orbital region. The laser beam is delivered through multiple deflective and refractive elements and focused to a spot size of approximately 120 µm in diameter at incidence to the skin to deposit an array of laser beams across the surface. Pulse energy varies from 5 to 70 mJ and density from 5 to 70 %. The pulse duration is 10 msec. In the present study, patients received two passes at 15 mJ (1st pass) and 20 mJ (2nd pass), respectively, with a total density of 20 %.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fractional erbium:YAG laser treatment

The Er:YAG laser used in this study has a fractional handpiece (MCL 30 Dermablate, Asclepion Laser Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany). By means of a microlens array the laser beam is divided into 13 x 13 small spots with 250 µm diameter each, spread over an area of 13 x 13 mm. A coverage of 5 % of the skin is achieved with a single pass. The pulse duration is 400 μsec. In this trial, we performed 4 passes (resulting in coverage of 20 % of the treated skin) with a total fluence of 60 J/cm² and pulse stacking (6 stacked pulses) to optimize thermal exposure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 40-55
* mild to moderate peri-orbital rhytides

Exclusion Criteria

* unrealistic expectations
* inability to meet follow-up criteria
* Fitzpatrick skin phototype \>III
* coagulation disorders or anti-coagulant treatment
* allergy to lidocaine or tetracaine
* oral isotretinoin within the last 6 months
* any active skin disease within the treatment areas (e. g., cancer, autoimmune disease)
* synthetic implants in the treatment area
* facial cosmetic procedures affecting the treatment area within the last 6 months
* photosensitizing medications (e. g., tetracycline, gold)
* history of keloid formation
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laserklinik Karlsruhe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laserklinik Karlsruhe

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Syrus Karsai, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laserklinik Karlsruhe

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laserklinik Karlsruhe

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LK_05_2009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rosacea Radiofrequency Microneedling
NCT06801717 RECRUITING NA
Fractional Laser vs. Ultrasound for Periorbital Wrinkles
NCT01529983 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1