Comparison of Central Venous Pressures (CVPs) Measured From Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC) and CICC in Liver Transplantation Recipients

NCT ID: NCT00988871

Last Updated: 2009-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-31

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring from the peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) has not often been used because of the higher inherent resistance of the PICC due to its longer length and narrower lumen. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the CVP measured from PICCs as a predictor of the CVP measured from CICCs in the setting of rapidly fluctuating hemodynamic conditions during liver transplantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the protocol of LT in our hospital, a PICC is concomitantly inserted with the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and 9-Fr advanced venous access (AVA) catheter for the LT recipient at anesthetic induction. PAC and AVA catheter are usually removed on the second postoperative day, and instead the PICC is used for the postoperative infusion of prostaglandin E1 which is very irritable to small peripheral vein. So we fortunately had chance to measure the CVPs from both CICC and PICC simultaneously in the same patients.

Methods: We measured the CVPs from the CICC and the PICC simultaneously during each main surgical period of adult liver transplantation (preanhepatic, anhepatic, reperfusion, and neo-hepatic period). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using simple linear regression analysis to observe whether changes in the PICCP were paralleled by simultaneous changes in the CICCP. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the degree of agreement between the two devices. Analysis of variance was performed to study whether there were changes in the CVP agreement profiles in regard to the different time periods of LT. Differences were regarded as being statistically significant when p values were less than 0.05.

(This observational study has been completed already.)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients Cannulated With Both PICC and CICC. The Rapidly Fluctuating Hemodynamics During LT.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liver transplantation (LT) recipients

LT recipients who had both PICC and CICC at the same time according to the LT protocol of our hospital

PICC, CICC

Intervention Type DEVICE

PICC insertion, CICC (advanced venous access with pulmonary artery catheter) insertion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PICC, CICC

PICC insertion, CICC (advanced venous access with pulmonary artery catheter) insertion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients who had been scheduled for elective liver transplant surgery
* Patients who had been placed with both PICC and CICC at anesthetic induction

Exclusion Criteria

* Failure to insert PICC
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Center, Korea

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Anesthesiology and pain medicine, Research institute and hospital, National cancer center, Republic of Korea

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

So-Hee Park, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of cancer registration and biostatistics branch, Research institute and hospital, National cancer center, Republic of Korea

Soon-Ae Lee, MD.PhD.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology and pain medicine, Research institute and hospital, National cancer center, Republic of Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center

323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB. Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters. Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;28(12):3833-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11153622 (View on PubMed)

McLemore EC, Tessier DJ, Rady MY, Larson JS, Mueller JT, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, Patel BM. Intraoperative peripherally inserted central venous catheter central venous pressure monitoring in abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;20(5):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s10016-006-9108-x. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16871437 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PICC1342

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.