Long Term Safety and Efficacy Trial of Beclomethasone Dipropionate - Hydrofluoroalkane (BDP-HFA) 320 mcg in Allergic Rhinitis

NCT ID: NCT00988247

Last Updated: 2021-12-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

529 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis will be randomized to 320 mcg of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant or placebo as a nasal aerosol. The subjects will be followed for safety and efficacy for a period of 30 or 52 weeks. BDP HFA is a steroid which is currently FDA approved for the treatment of asthma. BDP-HFA should be safe and effective as a "dry" nasal aerosol which may be preferred by some patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial BDP-HFA Hay fever Allergic rhinitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BDP HFA 320 µg/day

During the 30-week (or 52-week, depending upon investigator site) double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered 4 actuations (two per nostril) of 80 µg BDP HFA once daily each morning.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Beclomethasone dipropionate

Intervention Type DRUG

Total daily dose of 320 micrograms per day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) applied as a nasal aerosol each morning for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Placebo

During the 30-week (or 52-week, depending upon investigator site) double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of placebo HFA once daily each morning.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Nasal Aerosol

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo nasal aerosol administered daily for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Beclomethasone dipropionate

Total daily dose of 320 micrograms per day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) applied as a nasal aerosol each morning for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Nasal Aerosol

Placebo nasal aerosol administered daily for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

QNASL(TM)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female subjects, 12 years of age or older as of the Screening Visit (SV)
* General good health, and free of any concomitant conditions or treatment that could interfere with study conduct, influence the interpretation of study observations/results, or put the subject at increased risk during the study
* A history of PAR to a relevant perennial allergen for a minimum of two years immediately preceding the study Screening Visit (SV). The PAR must have been of sufficient severity to have required treatment (either continuous or intermittent) in the past, and in the investigator's judgment is expected to require treatment throughout the entire study
* A demonstrated sensitivity to at least one allergen known to induce PAR through a standard skin prick test. A positive test is defined as a wheal diameter at least 3 mm larger than the diluent control wheal for the skin prick test. Documentation of a positive result 12 months prior to Screening Visit (SV) is acceptable
* Other criteria apply

Exclusion Criteria

* History of physical findings of nasal pathology, including nasal polyps or other clinically significant respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal biopsy, nasal trauma, including nasal piercing, or surgery and atrophic rhinitis or rhinitis medicamentosa (all within the last 60 days prior to Screening Visit \[SV\])
* Participation in any investigational drug study within the 30 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV) or planned participation in another investigational drug study at any time during this study
* History of a respiratory infection or disorder (including, but not limited to bronchitis, pneumonia, chronic sinusitis, or influenza within the 14 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV) or development of a respiratory infection during the Run-In Period
* Active asthma requiring treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids and/or routine use of β-agonists and any controller drugs (e.g., theophylline, leukotriene antagonists). History of intermittent use (less than or equal to 3 uses per week) of inhaled short acting beta-agonists prior to the Screening Visit (SV) is acceptable.
* Other criteria apply

Randomization Criteria

* Subject continues to be in general good health, meeting the selection criteria
* Subject has a minimum subject-reported reflective TNSS of an average of 5 (out of a possible 12) on the last 7 days during the Run-In Period
* The subject-reported scores for rhinorrhea or nasal congestion must be an average of 2 or greater during the last 7 days of the Run-In Period
* Each subject must have adequately completed the electronic AR Assessment Diary (failure is defined as missing the diary entry on more than 2 calendar days during the last 7 days of the Run-In Period)
* Other criteria apply
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Teva Branded

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Teva Clinical Sudy Site

Oxford, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Normal, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Lenexa, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Plymouth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

North Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Rockville Centre, New York, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Kerrville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Teva Clinical Study Site

West Allis, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Meltzer EO, Jacobs RL, LaForce CF, Kelley CL, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. Safety and efficacy of once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):249-57. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3571.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22737708 (View on PubMed)

Meltzer EO, Jacobs RL, LaForce CF, Dorinsky PM, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. . BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol 320 µg Once Daily Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Nasal Symptoms Associated With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011 (Supplement); 107(11):A118 - Poster presentation.

Reference Type RESULT

Carr W, Meltzer EO, Finn A, Dorinsky PM, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. Effective nasal symptom relief and improvement in health-related quality of life in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis following 6-week once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012 (Supplement); 129:AB188 - Poster presentation

Reference Type RESULT

Gross GN, Settipane RA, Ford LB, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK, Dorinsky PM . Patient Satisfaction and Ease-of-Use of BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol Device in Subjects With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011 (Supplement); 107(11):A119 - Poster presentation

Reference Type RESULT

Weinstein SF, Andrews CP, Shah SR, Chylack LT Jr, Tankelevich A, Ding Y, Tantry SK. Long-term efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):323-31. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3767.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24992552 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BDP-AR-303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id