Biomarkers of Lupus Disease: Serial Biomarker Sampling in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

NCT ID: NCT00987831

Last Updated: 2014-10-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis: A reason for repeated disappointing outcomes of clinical trials testing targeted immune biologics for lupus may be the heterogeneity of the disease, exacerbated by the variable effects on immune homeostasis of the background medications that must be continued, in most study designs, in these flare-prone patients.

Purpose of Study: This study was designed to purposefully study a population equivalent to the placebo group of typical trials in SLE. In Group A patients entered the trial in mild-moderate flare, were treated with depomedrol, and any background immune suppressants withdrawn. Biomarkers at entry on various medications can be compared to biomarkers after steroid efficacy with background immune suppressants withdrawn. Depomedrol usually wears off over one to three months. Patients were closely observed, with serial biomarkers drawn at monthly intervals or immediately at the time of a new flare. Those patients developing new flares donated blood samples, were immediately treated as deemed appropriate, exiting the study. Group A was designed for up to 50 patients and recruited a total of 41. An additional group of 62 SLE patients donated blood once without additional interventions in order to increase the power of exploratory cross-sectional biomarker analysis on different immune suppressants (Group B). A control population of matched, healthy individuals donated blood twice for the same biomarker studies to validate these assays (Group C).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Original Protocol for Group A: Patients with at least a SLEDAI score of 6 or a BILAG score of B in at least two organ systems or A in at least one organ system were immediately entered into this study once informed consent was obtained. Background immune suppressants (if any) were stopped and in about half of the patients hydroxychloroquine was also stopped. All patients immediately received a shot of depomedrol 160 mg IM. Over the next two weeks they could elect up to three more shots of depomedrol for a total of four shots by the two week visit period. A complete battery of blood tests to assess lupus disease was drawn at the screening visit, and monthly thereafter. Exploratory biomarker studies were drawn as often as weekly for some markers and as often as three times in the study (landmark visits) for others. Protocol Changes during course of study: Biomarkers were drawn at Day zero, week 2 week 4 and monthly thereafter until flare. Patients who did not improve with protocol steroid treatments were withdrawn from Group A and immediately treated as warranted. Since there was no protocol-defined improving visit, they could not continue the protocol until flare. However their baseline samples were appropriate for study as part of Group B (see below).

Landmark visits for Group A are defined as: 1.) screening (pre-dose, on background meds with active disease) 2.) two weeks or four weeks after screening as optimal to assess a patient who has stopped background meds and is now maximally improved (but at least one grade drop in BILAG scores in all organs entered at A or B or a four point drop in SLEDAI, otherwise the participant is deemed a treatment failure and could not participate further in Group A. 3.) Flare visit on no background immune suppression defined as an increase in SLEDAI of 4 points from maximal improvement or one new BILAG moderate (B) score AND the investigator considers the condition to be a significant flare with intent to treat. Patients were (whenever possible) seen within 3 days for the flare visit if flare occured between monthly scheduled visits.

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the time to flare and safety of a treatment withdrawal protocol in patients with active, but non-organ threatening SLE. The following biomarkers were obtained for exploratory analysis: cytokine panel, B Cell studies, T Cell studies, autoantibody profiles, epigenetic and gene expression studies and flow cytometry studies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blood drawing only Group C

Healthy controls, age, sex and ethnicity matched to the active study participants were recruited for two time blood donation as controls for the biomarker studies

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood drawing only Group C

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood drawing and Brief medical history to ensure status of healthy control

Group A SLE prospective study

In Group A SLE patients enter with active disease. Any immune suppressant (e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine or mmf) is withdrawn and after blood drawing, depomedrol up to 160 mg IM is given. This may be repeated for a maximum of 160mg up to four times total in the first two weeks. Depomedrol is expected to last 1-3 months, serial biomarkers will be drawn until time of flare, at which time biomarkers will be drawn, patient is defined as meeting endpoint and new treatment initiated. Patients may elect to continue to donate blood samples per protocol up to one year.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group A SLE prospective study

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients have history and physical exmamination at each visit. Blood is drawn at each visit. At baseline, any background immune suppressant is stopped and patients given depomedrol up to 160 mg IM which can be repeated up to four times in the first two weeks. Patients are seen again at week 2, 4 and monthly until the final flare visit at which time they donate blood, receive appropriate treatments and exit study. Patients may elect to continue in study for up to one year. The following disease activity measures are included: SLEDAI, BILAG, CLASI, PGA, PROs (including lupus PRO and SF-36 ant ptGA), joint counts, exploratory outcome measures,BICLA,SRI

Group B SLE one blood donation

SLE patients who meet the same entry criteria as Group A could elect to donate blood one time and not to continue in the prospective protocol. No extra intervention was performed other than blood draw and medical records review. This allowed an extension of cross sectional comparisons between biomarker changes related to background treatments by combining Group A baseline data with Group B data.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group B SLE one blood donation

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood drawing, history, physical examination,medical record review, questionnaires, completion of disease activity measures including SLEDAI,BILAG, CLASI,PGA,PROs,LFA investigational systems, BICLA, SRI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group B SLE one blood donation

Blood drawing, history, physical examination,medical record review, questionnaires, completion of disease activity measures including SLEDAI,BILAG, CLASI,PGA,PROs,LFA investigational systems, BICLA, SRI

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood drawing only Group C

Blood drawing and Brief medical history to ensure status of healthy control

Intervention Type OTHER

Group A SLE prospective study

Patients have history and physical exmamination at each visit. Blood is drawn at each visit. At baseline, any background immune suppressant is stopped and patients given depomedrol up to 160 mg IM which can be repeated up to four times in the first two weeks. Patients are seen again at week 2, 4 and monthly until the final flare visit at which time they donate blood, receive appropriate treatments and exit study. Patients may elect to continue in study for up to one year. The following disease activity measures are included: SLEDAI, BILAG, CLASI, PGA, PROs (including lupus PRO and SF-36 ant ptGA), joint counts, exploratory outcome measures,BICLA,SRI

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

depomedrol medrol methylprednisolone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

SLE Groups (Group A and B):

1. ACR criteria for SLE.
2. At least two organ systems moderately active to a minimum of BILAG B or SLEDAI score of 6.

Control group (Group C):

1. Age, ethnicity and gender matched (2:1) with an SLE study participant.
2. Free of active or major chronic disease as determined by brief history.

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Safety or circumstantial reasons why volunteer cannot comply with the protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joan Merrill, MD

Head, Clinical Pharmacology Research Program

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joan T Merrill

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Pfizer Inc

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Merrill JT, Immermann F, Whitley M, Zhou T, Hill A, O'Toole M, Reddy P, Honczarenko M, Thanou A, Rawdon J, Guthridge JM, James JA, Sridharan S. The Biomarkers of Lupus Disease Study: A Bold Approach May Mitigate Interference of Background Immunosuppressants in Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1257-1266. doi: 10.1002/art.40086.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28257602 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pfizer Inc

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

OMRF 09-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Atacicept Demonstrating Dose RESponSe
NCT01440231 WITHDRAWN PHASE2