Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors in Hemodialysis

NCT ID: NCT00985322

Last Updated: 2021-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

269 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a specific cardioprotective effect and, compared to treatment not directly interfering with the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS), significantly reduce cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in subjects with normal renal function.

Despite CV events are the leading cause of death in these patients, no adequately powered trial so far evaluated the specific cardioprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in this population.

Objectives: This prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point (PROBE) trial is primarily aimed at evaluating whether, at comparable blood pressure (BP) control, ACE inhibitor as compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy significantly reduces the incidence of a composite end point of CV death (including sudden death) and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke in 266 patients with arterial hypertension (pre-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP \>140/90 mmHg or post-dialysis systolic/diastolic BP \>130/80 mmHg or antihypertensive therapy) and/or echocardiography evidence of LVH (cardiac mass index \>130 g/m2 for men and 100 g/m2 for women) who are on dialysis therapy since at least six months. Secondarily, the study will compare the incidence of single components of the primary outcome, new onset paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, thrombosis of the artero-venous fistula, new onset, progression or regression of LVH, changes in components of the metabolic syndrome, the safety profile of the two treatment regimens and their cost/effectiveness.

Methods: After 1 month wash-out period from previous RAS inhibitor therapy and a baseline evaluation of main clinical and laboratory parameters, patients will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to 2-year treatment with an ACE inhibitor or a BP lowering regiment not including RAS inhibitors. A balanced distribution according to centre, number of dialysis sessions per week (2 or 3), presence of diabetes (YES/NO), arterial hypertension (YES/NO), LVH (YES/NO) will be achieved by the minimization method. Treatment will be adjusted to achieve and maintain a target BP \<140/90 mmHg (pre-dialysis) and a target BP \<130/80 mmHg (post-dialysis) in both groups.

Expected results: ACE inhibitor compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy is expected to reduce more effectively fatal and non-fatal CV events, prevent or limit progression or induce regression of LVH, improve some components of the metabolic syndrome, and reduce treatment costs for cardiovascular complications. These findings might help achieving more effective cardioprotection in people on chronic dialysis at lower costs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have the broader effect of any drug in cardiovascular medicine, reducing the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes, and renal impairment.A recent meta-analysis of 33,500 patients included in six randomized clinical trials and a pooled analysis of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE), the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA, and the Prevention of Events with Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) trials showed that ACE inhibitors reduce mortality and cardiovascular events also in subjects with coronary artery disease but preserved left ventricular function. However, all the above studies excluded patients with advanced renal insufficiency or end stage renal disease (ESRD). Thus, whether ACE inhibitors may have a specific cardioprotective effect also in this typology of patients is still matter of investigation. This is an issue of major clinical relevance since CV disease is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in the ESRD population and affects as many as 50-60% of ESRD patients.The burden of CV disease in this population is predicted to dramatically increase over the next few years because of the rapidly increasing number of patients requiring renal replacement therapy and the increasing prevalence of ESRD patients at increased cardiovascular risk because of older age, diabetes and hypertension.

Despite the excess CV risk, a consistent proportion of ESRD patients are not given ACE inhibitor therapy because of concern of hyperkalemia. Others, on the contrary, are treated on the basis of results of available trials. However, whether data in subjects without renal insufficiency can be generalized also to those with ESRD is unknown. This is an itchy point since dialysis patients might respond differently to therapies of proven benefits in non-ESRD patients. For instance, data from the German Diabetes and Dialysis study showed that, unlike in the general population, HmGCoA inhibitor therapy failed to decrease CV mortality in a hemodialysis population. Thus, ad hoc studies in the ESRD population are urgently needed. A recent trial, the Fosinopril in Dialysis (FOSIDIAL) study, tried to address this issue, but was clearly underpowered and results were inconclusive. However, evidence of a non significant trend to less cardiovascular events in the ACE inhibitor arm, suggests that ACE inhibitors might have a specific cardioprotective effect also in this population.

Thus, whether ACE inhibitor therapy more effectively than non-RAS inhibitor therapy reduces CV morbidity in high risk patients on chronic dialysis therapy is worth investigating in an adequately powered trial.

Aims

The broad aim of the study is to evaluate whether ACE inhibitor therapy reduces CV mortality and morbidity in high-risk ESRD patients with arterial hypertension and/or LVH who are on chronic hemodialysis therapy since \>6 months.

Primary:

* To assess whether, at comparable BP control, ACE inhibitor as compared to non-RAS inhibitor therapy reduces the incidence of a combined end-point of CV death (including sudden cardiac death and cardiac arrest resuscitation) and myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke.

Secondary:

* To compare the incidence of the single components of the combined end-point, of myocardial or peripheral revascularizations, new onset of atrial fibrillation in one of its three forms (paroxysmal, persistent and permanent) or recurrence of the arrhythmia in patients who experienced paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation previously, hospitalizations for chronic heart failure and thrombosis of the artero-venous fistula.
* To evaluate whether ACE inhibitors prevent, limit progression or achieve regression of LVH and ameliorate some of the components of the metabolic syndrome and whether these effects correlates with CV outcomes.
* To compare the cost/effectiveness of the two treatments.

Safety:

* Serious (including disturbances of cardiac rhythm and electrical conduction possibly related to hyperkalemia) and non-serious adverse events.
* Any clinical or laboratory abnormality -such as symptomatic hypotension, cough, hyperkalemia (serum potassium \>6 mEq/L), anemia requiring increasing doses of erythropoietin- possibly related to ACE inhibitor therapy.

Design:

This prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point (PROBE) trial will include 266 hypertensive ESRD patients with echocardiography evidence of LVH who are on chronic hemodialysis since \>6 months. After 1 month wash-out period from previous RAS inhibitor therapy and stratification for diabetes YES/NO, they will have a baseline evaluation of main clinical and laboratory parameters and will be randomized to 2-year treatment with an ACE inhibitor or a BP lowering regimen not including RAS inhibitors. Treatment will be adjusted to achieve and maintain a target BP \<140/90 mmHg (pre-dialysis) and a target BP \<130/80 mmHg (post-dialysis) in both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACE inhibitor Ramipril

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACE inhibitor Ramipril

Intervention Type DRUG

The ACE inhibitor (Ramipril) will be started at 1.25 mg/day and will be up-titrated to 2.5 mg/day, to 5 mg/day, and then to 10 mg/day according to BP control and tolerability.

non-RAS inhibitor antihypertensive therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

non-RAS inhibitor antihypertensive therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Blood Pressure lowering regimen not including RAS inhibitors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACE inhibitor Ramipril

The ACE inhibitor (Ramipril) will be started at 1.25 mg/day and will be up-titrated to 2.5 mg/day, to 5 mg/day, and then to 10 mg/day according to BP control and tolerability.

Intervention Type DRUG

non-RAS inhibitor antihypertensive therapy

Blood Pressure lowering regimen not including RAS inhibitors

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women \>18 years of age who are on chronic renal replacement treatment since at least 6 months with two or three haemodialysis sessions per week.
* Hypertension (pre-dialysis systolic and/or diastolic BP \>140/90 mmHg or post-dialysis systolic and/or diastolic BP \>130/80 mmHg or ongoing antihypertensive therapy).

and/or

* LVH defined by a cardiac mass index \>130 g/m2 for men and 100 g/m2 for women (17) within three months of enrolment.
* Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Specific indication (such as heart failure) or contraindication (such as hypersensitivity) to ACE inhibitor therapy.
* Any concomitant medication with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists
* Hyperkalemia (serum potassium \>6 mEq/L) despite optimal control of metabolic acidosis and blood glucose (in diabetics) in patient with less then three dialysis sessions per week.
* Symptomatic chronic or intradialytic hypotension.
* Arrhythmias that in the Investigator judgement might be worsened by hyperkalemia (such as sinus bradycardia, delayed atrio-ventricular conduction, atrio-ventricular blocks).
* CV events (stroke, acute myocardial infarction or other acute coronary syndromes) over the last three months.
* Uncontrolled hyper- or hypo-thyroidism.
* Active systemic disease, malignancies and any clinical condition associated with a life-expectancy of less than 2 years.
* Drug or alcohol abuse, psychiatric disorders and inability to understand the potential risks or benefits of the study.
* Pregnancy, lactation or child bearing potential and ineffective contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piero Ruggenenti, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico San Pietro

Ponte San Pietro, Bergamo, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale "Treviglio-Caravaggio"

Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy

Site Status

Hospital of Montichiari

Montichiari, Brescia, Italy

Site Status

Presidio Ospedaliero Acireale

Acireale, Catania, Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Morgagni-Pierantoni"

Forlì, Forlì Cesena, Italy

Site Status

A.O. Desio e Vimercate

Desio, MB, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale "Caduti Bollatesi"

Bollate, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Hospital of Cernusco sul Naviglio

Cernusco sul Naviglio, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Bassini"

Cinisello Balsamo, Milano, Italy

Site Status

A.O. Ospedale Civile di Legnano

Legnano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

A.O. della Provincia di Lodi

Lodi, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Presidio Ospedaliero di Magenta

Magenta, Milano, Italy

Site Status

IRCCS "Humanitas"

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

IRCCS Multimedia

Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Fondazione San Raffaele Monte Tabor

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio

Agrigento, , Italy

Site Status

Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti "

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi"

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

A.O. Giuseppe Brotzu

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

ASL 8 - S.C. Territoriale di Nefrologia e Dialisi

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

A.O. S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo

Cuneo, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "San Paolo"

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "San Gerardo"

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Di Parma"

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital "Degli Infermi"

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

A.O. Umberto I

Syracuse, , Italy

Site Status

P.O. G. Mazzini

Teramo, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ruggenenti P, Podesta MA, Trillini M, Perna A, Peracchi T, Rubis N, Villa D, Martinetti D, Cortinovis M, Ondei P, Condemi CG, Guastoni CM, Meterangelis A, Granata A, Mambelli E, Pasquali S, Genovesi S, Pieruzzi F, Bertoli SV, Del Rosso G, Garozzo M, Rigotti A, Pozzi C, David S, Daidone G, Mingardi G, Mosconi G, Galfre A, Romei Longhena G, Pacitti A, Pani A, Hidalgo Godoy J, Anders HJ, Remuzzi G; ARCADIA Study Organization. Ramipril and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: The ARCADIA Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):575-587. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12940820. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33782036 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-003529-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ARCADIA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Loop Diuretics in Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00478543 COMPLETED PHASE4