Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Paricalcitol Versus Cinacalcet With Low-Dose Vitamin D
NCT ID: NCT00977080
Last Updated: 2012-06-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
272 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2011-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
NCT01181531
Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for Efficacy and Safety in Stage 3/4 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT)
NCT00823303
Study to Assess the Impact on Calcium Levels When Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Switch From Cinacalcet to Etelcalcetide
NCT01932970
20070360 Incident Dialysis
NCT00803712
Paricalcitol Compared to Maxacalcitol in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
NCT00990704
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IV Paricalcitol
Participants in the IV stratum received intravenous (IV) paricalcitol and, if hypercalcemia (calcium \>= 10.5 mg/dL), received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet. Paricalcitol was dosed at 0.07 mcg/kg with titration every 2 weeks.
Paricalcitol
Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
Cinacalcet (at sites with IV paricalcitol)
Participants in the IV stratum received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet daily with a low-dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (doxercalciferol IV 1 mcg 3 times weekly (TIW) at sites in the US and alfacalcidol capsules 0.25 mcg daily at sites in Russia).
Cinacalcet
On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)
Oral paricalcitol
Participants in the oral stratum received oral paricalcitol and, if hypercalcemia (calcium \>= 10.5 mg/dL), received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet. Paricalcitol was dosed at mcg = IPTH/60 3 times weekly (TIW) with titration every 2 weeks.
Paricalcitol
Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
Cinacalcet (at sites with oral paricalcitol)
Participants in the oral stratum received 30 mg of oral cinacalcet daily with a low-dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (alfacalcidol capsules 0.25 mcg daily).
Cinacalcet
On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Paricalcitol
Paricalcitol dosed per label by region (participants were to receive cinacalcet if they developed hypercalcemia)
Cinacalcet
On-label oral cinacalcet by region with low dose vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) (either doxercalciferol at US sites or alfacalcidol at non-US sites)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient was diagnosed with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and had been receiving intravenous (IV) or oral vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) or cinacalcet during the 8 weeks prior to the screening period or naïve patients who had not received VDRA or cinacalcet within 8 weeks of screening.
3. Patient was on maintenance HD (hemodialysis) 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months prior to screening and was expected to remain on HD for the duration of the study.
4. For entry into the Pre-Treatment Washout Period (for patients who were not naïve to VDRAs and cinacalcet), the patient had to have screening laboratory values of:
* iPTH level 130 to 700 pg/mL
* Serum Total Alkaline Phosphatase level \>= 40 U/L
* Calcium level \<= 10.0 mg/dL (2.49 mmol/L)
* Calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP) \<= 75 mg2/dL2 (US) and \<= 70 mg2/dL2 (non-US)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient had a current malignancy (with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), or clinically significant liver disease, in the opinion of the investigator.
3. Use of known inhibitors (i.e., ketoconazole) or inducers (i.e., carbamazepine) of cytochrome P450 (including grapefruit and/or grapefruit juice) 3A (CYP3A) or drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) (e.g., flecainide, vinblastine, thioridazine, and most tricyclic antidepressants) within 2 weeks prior to study drug administration. Commonly used beta blockers such as metoprolol and carvedilol are allowed but are metabolized by CYP2D6; thus, an adjustment to a lower dose may have been required.
4. Patient was known to be human immunodeficiency (HIV) positive.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samina Khan, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Abbott
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22781
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24342
Chula Vista, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21142
Los Angeles, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22762
Los Angeles, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22758
Riverside, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21442
San Diego, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23688
Arvada, Colorado, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21370
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 25902
Hudson, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21146
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 26743
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22788
Miami, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22722
Orlando, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23147
Tampa, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22778
Meridian, Idaho, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21369
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22786
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21144
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21443
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21145
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22505
Flushing, New York, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22759
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22796
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22770
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22772
Aiken, South Carolina, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21147
Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22982
Houston, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21143
Houston, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22506
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22776
Bluefield, West Virginia, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22311
Brno, , Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22310
Jilemnice, , Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21624
Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22363
Aalborg, , Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23105
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23909
Fredericia, , Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22462
Holstebro, , Denmark
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21748
Coburg, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 33268
Darmstadt, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 35903
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21742
Frankfurt, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21744
Heilbronn, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21368
Lüdenscheid, , Germany
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22362
Athens, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38970
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22322
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22463
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22323
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39262
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22312
Bergamo, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21746
Genova, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39180
Lucca, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22314
Milan, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21367
Pavia, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21745
Pesaro, , Italy
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21842
Alkmaar, , Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22309
Delft, , Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21843
Dordrecht, , Netherlands
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38903
Beja, , Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38531
Faro, , Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22464
Lisbon, , Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23910
Vila Franca de Xira, , Portugal
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24643
Moscow, , Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 24642
Moscow, , Russia
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21361
Barcelona, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21364
Córdoba, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22366
L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38343
Madrid, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21362
Madrid, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21363
Palma de Mallorca, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22367
Pamplona, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38462
Puerto de la Cruz, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21365
Seville, , Spain
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23913
Linköping, , Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23782
Stockholm, , Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 22364
Uppsala, , Sweden
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23912
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 21747
Coventry, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23102
London, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23104
London, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 23103
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41982
Omagh, Northern Ireland, , United Kingdom
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40222
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cozzolino M, Ketteler M, Martin KJ, Sharma A, Goldsmith D, Khan S. Paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy affects markers of bone mineral disease in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT-SHPT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):899-905. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu011. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Sharma A, Marshall TS, Khan SS, Johns B. Cost effectiveness of paricalcitol versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients in the USA. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Feb;34(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0151-4.
Ketteler M, Martin KJ, Wolf M, Amdahl M, Cozzolino M, Goldsmith D, Sharma A, Marx S, Khan S. Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3270-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs018. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-011378-14
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
M10-967
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.