A Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and System of Supportive Psychotherapy (SYSP) for Early Onset Chronic Depression

NCT ID: NCT00970437

Last Updated: 2017-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

268 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) with the non-specific System of Supportive Psychotherapy (SYSP)in early onset chronically depressives.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. In addition, most of the studies had methodological weaknesses, such as the very short courses of psychotherapy. Usually, chronic depression begins early in life, is often associated with early interpersonal trauma, and results in an even more substantial human capital loss than the late-onset group. Furthermore, it shows a weak response to medication and a high rate of relapse after an initial response. With the present multicentre study, the efficacy of the only specific psychotherapy for chronic depression (Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy/CBASP) is compared with a non-specific System of Supportive Psychotherapy/SYSP in early onset chronically depressives. CBASP faired very well in one large trial but has never been directly compared to a non-specific psychotherapeutic control. Another innovative aspect of the study is the use of an extended course of psychotherapy (32 sessions). Primary hypothesis: CBASP is more effective in reducing depressive symptoms than SYSP.

A naturalistic study following up the patients of the trial up to two years after termination of the study treatments is performed in order to investigate the long-term effectiveness of CBASP compared to the System of Supportive Psychotherapy. The primary outcome of this follow-up study is the rate of well-weeks (weeks with no or minimal depression symptoms) during the two years after termination of the study treatments as measured with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) Interview

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CBASP

CBASP as the experimental intervention will follow a manual (McCullough, 2000; German version: Schramm et al., 2006). The approach is specifically tailored for the treatment of chronic forms of depression, particularly with early-onset by focusing on the problems resulting from an inhibition of maturation in early childhood and by using the therapeutic relationship in a personal, disciplined way as well as other specific techniques (e.g. Interpersonal Discrimination Exercise, Situation Analysis). CBASP integrates behavioural, cognitive, and interpersonal strategies.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation

SYSP

The comparator for CBASP is SYSP, a system of supportive psychotherapy, an active but less specific, manualized control treatment. SYSP - defined as non-interpersonal and non-cognitive-behavioral therapy - resembles supportive clinical management, client-centered therapy, counseling, and psychoeducation about depression. There is no specific explanatory mechanism for treatment effect offered to the patient and it does not focus on specific themes.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

System of Supportive Psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy

Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

System of Supportive Psychotherapy

Duration of intervention per patient: 20 weeks acute treatment (n=24 sessions) followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment (n=8 sessions) Follow-up per patient: 48 weeks after randomisation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Brief Supportive Psychotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. DSM-IV criteria for a current episode of chronic MDD, MDD superimposed on a pre-existing dysthymic disorder or recurrent MDD with incomplete remission between episodes in a patient with a current MDD and a total duration of at least 2 years.
2. Early onset of the disorder according to DSM-IV (onset before the age of 21)
3. Age between 18 and 65
4. A score of at least 20 on the 24-item HRSD at screening and, after a 2-week drug-free period, at baseline
5. Fluent in German language
6. Provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute risk for suicide (as opposed to suicidal thoughts) assessed according to clinical practice guidelines. Suicidal patients are eligible, as long as outpatient treatment is deemed safe by the clinician.
2. A history of psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, or organic brain disorders
3. A primary diagnosis of another axis I disorder including anxiety disorders (e.g. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder), or any severe substance-related abuse or dependence disorder as evaluated with the SCID-I
4. Antisocial, schizotypical, or borderline personality disorder (SCID-II);
5. Severe cognitive impairment
6. Absence of a response to previous adequate trial of CBASP, and/or SYSP
7. Other ongoing psychotherapy or medication
8. A serious medical condition (i.e. a history of seizures, severe head trauma, stroke or heart attack within six months before the study began)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Freiburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elisabeth Schramm

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elisabeth Schramm, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Martin Härter, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Hamburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schramm E, Kriston L, Zobel I, Bailer J, Wambach K, Backenstrass M, Klein JP, Schoepf D, Schnell K, Gumz A, Bausch P, Fangmeier T, Meister R, Berger M, Hautzinger M, Harter M. Effect of Disorder-Specific vs Nonspecific Psychotherapy for Chronic Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3880.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28146251 (View on PubMed)

Echterhoff J, Kriston L, Klein JP, Harter M, Schramm E, Schumacher L. Symptom-specific improvement across therapies and their putative mediators: A mediation network intervention analysis. Psychother Res. 2025 Apr;35(4):546-557. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2320349. Epub 2024 Mar 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38431848 (View on PubMed)

Schumacher L, Klein JP, Elsaesser M, Harter M, Hautzinger M, Schramm E, Kriston L. Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1160-1168. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2823.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37610747 (View on PubMed)

Humer E, Schramm E, Klein JP, Harter M, Hautzinger M, Pieh C, Probst T. Effects of alliance ruptures and repairs on outcomes. Psychother Res. 2021 Nov;31(8):977-987. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1874070. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33455531 (View on PubMed)

Meister R, Lanio J, Fangmeier T, Harter M, Schramm E, Zobel I, Hautzinger M, Nestoriuc Y, Kriston L. Adverse events during a disorder-specific psychotherapy compared to a nonspecific psychotherapy in patients with chronic depression. J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;76(1):7-19. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22869. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31576565 (View on PubMed)

Assmann N, Schramm E, Kriston L, Hautzinger M, Harter M, Schweiger U, Klein JP. Moderating effect of comorbid anxiety disorders on treatment outcome in a randomized controlled psychotherapy trial in early-onset persistently depressed outpatients. Depress Anxiety. 2018 Oct;35(10):1001-1008. doi: 10.1002/da.22839. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30199128 (View on PubMed)

Eich HS, Kriston L, Schramm E, Bailer J. The German version of the helping alliance questionnaire: psychometric properties in patients with persistent depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1697-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29685124 (View on PubMed)

Erkens N, Schramm E, Kriston L, Hautzinger M, Harter M, Schweiger U, Klein JP. Association of comorbid personality disorders with clinical characteristics and outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing two psychotherapies for early-onset persistent depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.091. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29329058 (View on PubMed)

Schramm E, Hautzinger M, Zobel I, Kriston L, Berger M, Harter M. Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus supportive psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 17;11:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-134.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21849054 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UKF001906

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RCT of Psilocybin-assisted CBT for Depression
NCT07281352 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2