Usefulness of Exhaled Breath Condensate for Evaluation of Markers of Airway Inflammation in Children With Asthma

NCT ID: NCT00961155

Last Updated: 2013-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has emerged as a novel noninvasive technique for assessment of airway inflammation, and it provides information on airway lining fluid composition. Traditionally, such assessment relies on invasive diagnostic tools such as bronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to obtain specimens from the airway but it is very uncomfortable procedure especially for young patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of allergic disease, disease monitoring and exposure to tobacco smoke on airway inflammation measured by markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) in children with asthma allergic to house dust mite. Also, we aim to assess correlations between cytokine concentrations in EBC and clinical characteristic of the patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction as another phenotype of asthma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Markers that can be identified in the EBC of patients with asthma include pH, hydrogen peroxide, nitrogen oxides, eicosanoids, isoprostanes, adenosine, certain cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Concentrations of these biomarkers are influenced by inflammation, oxidative stress, and can be modulated by therapeutic interventions. There is evidence that some markers in EBC differ between patients with asthma and controls, and some of them can correlate with asthma severity score, lung function. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of allergic disease, disease monitoring and exposure to tobacco smoke on airway inflammation measured by markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) in children with asthma allergic to house dust mite. We will also evaluate the effect of antiasthmatic treatment applied out of dust season on the number of exacerbations in "asthma epidemic" in September. We will evaluate the effect of exposure to tobacco smoke on antiasthmatic treatment.

Also, we aim to assess correlations between cytokine concentrations in EBC and clinical characteristic of the patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) as another phenotype of asthma. At the first study vist patients with EIB underwent fractional exhaled nitric oxide measurement (FeNO) and baseline spirometry, performed exercise treadmill challenge (ETC) and EBC samples were obtained at the end of ETC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

asthma children EBC exposure to tabacco antiasthma treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cyklezonid

children will receive 160 mcg once daily cyklezonid for 3 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cyklezonid

Intervention Type DRUG

160 mcg once daily

montelukast sodium

children will receive 5 or 10 mg montelukast sodium for 3 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

montelukast sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

5 or 10 mg according to age once daily

placebo

children will receive placebo for 8 weeks out of allergy season to house dust mite

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

fluticasone placebo twice daily, montelukast placebo once daily

formoterol

children will receive formoterol aerolzol 12mcg twice daily for 3 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

formoterol 12 mcg twice daily

Intervention Type DRUG

formoterol 12 mcg twice daily will be given to children for 3 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cyklezonid

160 mcg once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

montelukast sodium

5 or 10 mg according to age once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

fluticasone placebo twice daily, montelukast placebo once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

formoterol 12 mcg twice daily

formoterol 12 mcg twice daily will be given to children for 3 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Alvesco Formoterol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* children with mild to moderate asthma allergic to house dust mite exposed/nonexposed to tobacco smoke
* healthy children

Exclusion Criteria

* sensitization to allergens other than house dust mites
* other chronic diseases
* asthma exacerbation
* pregnancy
* oral corticosteroids for 4 weeks before the study
* montelukast sodium for 2 weeks before the study
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Lodz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Iwona Stelmach

MD, PhD, Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joanna Jerzynska, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Pediatrics and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Iwona Stelmach, MD PhD Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Pediatrics and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Agnieszka Brzozowska, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Pediatrics and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Pediatrics and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Joanna Jerzynska, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0048607153123

Email: [email protected]

Iwona Stelmach, MD PhD Prof

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0048426895972

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joanna Jerzynska, MD PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RNN/137/08/KE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id