Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert Study

NCT ID: NCT00958191

Last Updated: 2018-02-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the linear wear rates of the Trident® X3 polyethylene insert are superior to a polyethylene control group wear rate at 5 years postoperative. This measurement will be evaluated by comparing digitized images of serial radiographs obtained over a follow-up period of 5-years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a prospective, multi-center, historical-controlled clinical evaluation of the Trident® X3 Polyethylene insert. The device is commercially available in the United States where the study is being conducted. The study device, the Stryker Orthopaedics Trident® X3 polyethylene insert, is used for the replacement of the bearing surface of the acetabulum to relieve pain, instability, and the restriction of motion due to degenerative bone disease, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or failure of other devices. The control device, the Stryker Orthopaedics N2VAC polyethylene insert, is also used for the replacement of the bearing surface of the acetabulum to relieve pain, instability, and the restriction of motion due to degenerative bone disease, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or failure of other devices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert

Participants who received the Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert.

Group Type OTHER

Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert

Trident® X3 Polyethylene Insert

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient has signed an IRB-approved, study specific Patient Informed Consent Form.
2. The patient is a candidate for a primary total hip replacement with cementless acetabular and femoral components.
3. The patient has a primary diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease (NIDJD). Patient must have diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA), traumatic arthritis (TA), avascular necrosis (AVN), slipped capital epiphysis, pelvic fracture, femoral fracture, failed fracture fixation, or diastrophic variant.
4. The patient is a male or non-pregnant female patient ages 21 to 75.
5. The patient is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The patient has an active infection with the affected hip joint.
2. The patient requires revision surgery of a previously implanted total hip arthroplasty or hip fusion to the affected joint.
3. The patient has a BMI \>45.
4. The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
5. The patient has diagnosed systemic disease (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy).
6. The patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving chronic steroids in excess of 5mg per day.
7. The patient has a recent history of substance dependency that may result in deviations from the evaluation schedule.
8. The patient is a prisoner.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James D'Antonio, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Greater Pittsburgh Orthopaedic Association

Benjamin Bierbaum, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New England Baptist Hospital Deptartment of Orthopaedics

Peter Bonutti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bonutti Clinic

William Capello, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University School of Medicine

Michael Taunton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Robert Johnson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont College of Medicine Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation

J. Wesley Mesko, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Michigan Orthopaedic Center

James R Roberson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory Orthopaedics

John Wright, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New West Orthopaedics

Daniel Ward, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New England Baptist Hospital Department of Orthopaedics

Russell Meldrum, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University School of Medicine

J. Andrew Parr, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University School of Medicine

Steven Incavo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Greg Erens, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory Orthopaedics

Robert Trousdale, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Alren Hanssen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Bonutti Research Inc.

Effingham, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

New England Baptist Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

J. Wesley Mesko, MD

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Good Samaritan Hospital

Kearney, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Greater Pittsburgh Orthopaedics Assoc

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Vermont College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

57

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

All-poly Versus Metal-backed
NCT04358601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR
NCT04040764 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments Outcomes Study
NCT02521103 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Cemented vs Cementless TKA
NCT03683992 COMPLETED
Cemented vs Cementless Persona Keel RCT
NCT05630053 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA