Comparison Study of Breast Tomosynthesis Slice Thicknesses
NCT ID: NCT00957567
Last Updated: 2013-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
182 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-04-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Before this new technology can be used in the clinic routinely, it is necessary to perform a large number of studies to find the optimal way to use it. In this study, the investigators are aiming to find how thick the slices or layers representing the breast should be in the image when shown to the radiologist. The difference between these two thicknesses in how useful the images are to the radiologist could be important. The investigators are trying to determine if slicing the image of the breast into thicker slices will make the job of the radiologist easier or not when deciding to recommend or not a biopsy (laboratory analysis) of what the previous mammogram found. To find the answer to this question, the investigators will image patients with their tomosynthesis machine and look at the tomosynthesis images with the thin and thick slices. The radiologists that read each image will decide if they would have recommended the patient to get a biopsy based only in each of these images. The recommendations based on the images with thin slices and the recommendations based on the images with thick slices will be compared with what was actually recommended using the standard clinical tests. The investigators hope to find that the thicker slices help more than the thinner slices when trying to decide if biopsy is needed or not.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For tomosynthesis to reach its full potential, it is necessary to perform a large number of studies to find the optimal way to acquire the tomosynthesis images and the optimal way to mathematically combine these images to get the three dimensional image. In this study, we are aiming to find if the resulting three dimensional image should be divided into slices or layers each representing 1 millimeter (less than one 16th of an inch) of the breast or 5 millimeters (one 5th of an inch) of the breast. The difference between these two thicknesses in how useful the images are to the radiologist could be important. Up to now, tomosynthesis imaging has been performed with 1 millimeter slices, but there has been no scientific study to prove that this is the best slice thickness. We will try to determine if slicing the image of the breast into thicker slices will make the job of the radiologist easier or not when deciding to recommend or not a biopsy (laboratory analysis) of what the previous mammogram found. To find the answer to this question, we will image patients with our tomosynthesis machine and look at the tomosynthesis images with the thin and thick slices. The radiologists that read each image will decide if they would have recommended the patient to get a biopsy based only in each of these images. The recommendations based on the images with thin slices and the recommendations based on the images with thick slices will be compared with what was actually recommended using the standard clinical tests. We hope to show that the images with the thick slices will do as well if not better than those with the thin slices. Even if the thick slices only do as well as the thin slices, this will show that creating images with thicker slices is better, since these images can be read faster by the radiologist.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women who have had bilateral mastectomy
* Women with large breasts that cannot be accommodated within the field of view of the tomosynthesis system
* Women who are very frail and unable to cooperate
* Women who are under 35 years of age
* Women who cannot give informed consent
* Male subjects
* Women with implants
* Subject has had breast augmentation, except for unilateral augmentation done for prior mastectomy
35 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hologic, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mary Newell, MD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mary Newell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory University Hospital Breast Imaging Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00008667
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id