Rotator Cuff Repair (RCR) With and Without OrthoADAPT Augmentation
NCT ID: NCT00957255
Last Updated: 2017-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ortho-R® for Rotator Cuff Repair Compared With Standard of Care Rotator Cuff Repair Without Ortho-R®
NCT05333211
Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair Using Graft Reinforcement
NCT01025037
Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT03797287
Pilot Study of Augment Rotator Cuff for Surgical Treatment of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT01256242
Microfracture in Rotator Cuff Injury Repair
NCT02097901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RCR without augmentation
Rotator cuff repair without OrthoADAPT augmentation
Standard of care
Standard of care rotator cuff repair
RCR with augmentation
Rotator cuff repair with OrthoADAPT augmentation
OrthoADAPT
soft tissue augmentation device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OrthoADAPT
soft tissue augmentation device
Standard of care
Standard of care rotator cuff repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MRI confirmed full thickness or high grade partial thickness rotator cuff tear equal or more than 1 cm and involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons
* Tear is repairable by surgery using protocol prescribed fixation procedure
* Patient is able to sign and IRB approved study informed consent
* Patient is willing and able to return for follow-up appointments and study related procedures
* Patient is willing to comply with prescribed physical therapy regimen
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior same shoulder surgery including rotator cuff repair except prior subacromial decompression or distal clavicle resection
* Shoulder pathology requiring concomitant procedures during the rotator cuff repair including Labral repair, anterior or posterior stabilization, and/or capsular plication or shift
* Cervical spine disease
* History of adhesive capsulitis in either shoulder
* Patient whose injury does or may involve litigation
* Diabetics
* Rotator cuff tear cannot be repaired by primary surgical means including superiorly migrated humeral head, retracted rotator cuff that cannot be mobilized to humeral head, end stage tears, rotator cuff tissue cannot retain sutures, any comorbidities that would directly or indirectly affect the reparability of the cuff
* Patients with grade 3 or 4 glenohumeral arthritis
* Patients with systemic collage disease
* Patients with a known hypersensitivity to equine derived materials
* Active or latent infection
* Chronic use of immunosuppressive agents
* Any oral or IM NSAID usage within 5 days before surgery
* Cancer patients
* Decisional impaired patients
* Pregnant women
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Synovis Surgical Innovations
INDUSTRY
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charles DePaolo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mission Health Research Institute
Pierce Scranton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seattle Medical Research Foundation
William Bryan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Center for Orthopedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seattle Medical Research Foundation
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
O-0803
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.