An RCT to Compare the Outcomes of Patients With Large Rotator Cuff Repair That Undergo Repair With or Without SIS

NCT ID: NCT00182299

Last Updated: 2007-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prognosis for patients with large rotator cuff tears is poor. This recently developed biologic scaffold provides numerous structural and functional properties that may direct cell growth and aid in tendon healing. To date, there are no randomized clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of the patch to augment repairs of large rotator cuff tears. We propose a study to compare the rate of repair failure, quality of life, function, pain, and range of motion in 60 patients with large rotator cuff. Patients will be randomized (like flipping a coin) to undergo a standard rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation with SIS. Patients are assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-operative

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective of the full randomized trial To compare the effectiveness of a standardized method of rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation using porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) in patients with large rotator cuff tears.

Objectives of the pilot study

1. To obtain a preliminary estimate of the likely success of SIS.
2. To formally evaluate our ability to successfully recruit eligible patients into this study.
3. To determine appropriate length of follow up through examination of the pattern of incremental improvement and stabilization of quality of life over time following rotator cuff repair.
4. To determine a more accurate estimation of sample size for the full trial using quality of life.
5. To determine the frequency with which surgeons comply with the surgical protocol.
6. To determine the frequency with which patients and physiotherapists comply with the suggested physiotherapy protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with large rotator cuff tears (Type 1B or Type 2) determined by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging. Criteria described by Harryman et al (1991) will guide the classification of rotator cuff tears defined and reassessed at the time of surgery (Type 0 = intact cuff, Type 1A = thinned cuff or partial thickness defect, Type 1B= full thickness defect on one tendon, Type 2 = full thickness defect of two tendons, Type 3 = full thickness defect of three tendons).

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous shoulder surgery, excluding acromioplasty or diagnostic arthroscopy.
* Inability of the surgeon to repair the tear with remaining defect no greater than 10mm in diameter,
* Inability of the surgeon to repair the tear with less than 1cm of medialization,
* Evidence of other significant shoulder pathology including, Type II-IV SLAP lesion, Bankart lesion, Hill Sachs lesion, Grade III osteoarthritis).
* Active joint or systemic infection,
* Significant muscle paralysis of the shoulder girdle,
* Major medical illness that would preclude undergoing surgery,
* Patients who are unwilling or unable to be assessed according to study protocol for one year following surgery
* Major psychiatric illness, developmental handicap or inability to read and understand the English language
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

DePuy Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dianne M Bryant, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

63140-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id