Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulation Versus Ultrasound in Infraclavicular Block for Hand Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00956683

Last Updated: 2009-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current best practice for performance of infraclavicular block dictates the use of a dual-endpoint nerve stimulation technique that still only results in a 79% success rate. Use of an ultrasound-guided technique has the potential to significantly improve success. A randomized, controlled study to evaluate this area remains to be performed and is required to demonstrate to anesthesiologists that an ultrasound-guided approach should supersede nerve stimulation as the technique of choice for infraclavicular block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hand Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound guided infraclavicular block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of Ultrasound to help guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block.

Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulator

Nerve stimulator guided dual endpoint infraclavicular block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dual-Endpoint nerve stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of dual-endpoint nerve stimulation to guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Nerve Block

Use of Ultrasound to help guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dual-Endpoint nerve stimulation

Use of dual-endpoint nerve stimulation to guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery at or below the elbow.
* Patients aged \>18 and \<80 years
* ASA I-III
* BMI\<35

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to read, write or speak English. (This is necessary because subjects will have to follow detailed instructions to allow testing of motor and sensory function. It is not feasible to have an interpreter present in the block room during performance of these procedures)
* Contraindication to brachial plexus block
* Existing neurological deficit in the area to be blocked
* Known loco-regional malignancy or infection
* Coagulopathy
* Allergy to local anesthetic agents.
* Chest or shoulder deformities
* Severe respiratory disease
* Healed but dislocated clavicle fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University Health Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Colin McCartney

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2004-006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.