Trial of Small Intestine Submucosa (SIS) Mesh for Anterior Repair: A Pilot Study
NCT ID: NCT00955448
Last Updated: 2016-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
57 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One of the treatment options available is to repair the anterior wall surgically. The goals of surgery are to return the anatomy to its usual position, ensuring that all the pelvic floor organs (bladder, vagina and rectum) can function properly. The ideal surgical repair would also be long lasting.
Two surgical options are routinely performed in Calgary for repair of an anterior compartment prolapse. One option involves fixing the organs back in place using sutures. The other option uses sutures plus a mesh made of small intestine submucosa (SIS) that is already licensed for use in Canada. The SIS mesh is slowly absorbed after it is placed in the pelvic area. The investigators do not know which of these two options is the best surgical procedure. Both may have different advantages that would result in better results. This study is designed to try and find out if one of these procedures is better, and if a larger study may be needed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retropubic vs. Single-Incision Mid-Urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT03520114
Surgical Study Comparing 2 Procedures for the Treatment of a Dropped Bladder
NCT00271102
Sub Urethral Sling With or With Out Anterior Repair
NCT01246271
Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Safety and Performance of the EndoFast Reliant™ System in Vaginal Wall Reinforcement
NCT00446693
Single-incision Sling vs Urethral Bulking During Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Incontinence
NCT05210738
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SIS Mesh (Cook Medical)
Anterior prolapse repair will be reinforced using SIS mesh
SIS mesh (Cook Medical)
Anterior prolapse repair will be reinforced using surgical mesh made from porcine small intestine mucosa (Cook Medical)
Anterior prolapse repair
Anterior prolapse repair will be conducted without using mesh reinforcement
No-mesh
Anterior prolapse repair with no mesh reinforcement
Anterior prolapse repair
Anterior prolapse repair will be conducted without using mesh reinforcement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SIS mesh (Cook Medical)
Anterior prolapse repair will be reinforced using surgical mesh made from porcine small intestine mucosa (Cook Medical)
Anterior prolapse repair
Anterior prolapse repair will be conducted without using mesh reinforcement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Point Ba of 0 or greater: that is a positive Ba, indicating that the prolapse is beyond the introitus, not within the vagina.
* Patient must consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to graft material.
* Immunocompromised.
* Previous anterior compartment repair.
* Are unable to understand English.
* Will be unavailable for follow-up.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cook Group Incorporated
INDUSTRY
Alberta Health services
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Sue Ross
Adjunct Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Magali Robert, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robert M, Girard I, Brennand E, Tang S, Birch C, Murphy M, Ross S. Absorbable mesh augmentation compared with no mesh for anterior prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):288-294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000105.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ethics: E-22217
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Anterior SIS 300609
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.