Reducing Pain in Four- to Six-month Old Infants Undergoing Immunization Using a Multi-modal Approach

NCT ID: NCT00954499

Last Updated: 2011-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to answer the following question: In healthy infants aged four to six months undergoing routine immunization for diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type B (DTaP-IPV-Hib) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) while receiving a combination of proven analgesic interventions (least painful injection technique, holding by parent, and oral sucrose solution) and non-procedural talk by the parent, does the addition of rubbing near the site of injection reduce pain as measured by the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS) to a greater extent than no rubbing?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Immunization is a significant source of pain and distress for infants. At present pain-relieving interventions are rarely employed to manage this pain.

There are many non-pharmacological methods that can be used to reduce immunization pain. These include: sugar water, fast injection without aspiration, holding infants during the procedure, and non-procedural related parental behaviours such as distraction. At present, there are no studies of tactile stimulation during noxious procedures in infants and its effectiveness, therefore, is unclear. Light rubbing of the skin near the injection site that is administered by a parent immediately before, during and immediately after immunization is an easily learned, cost neutral intervention that could offer improved pain management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain From Immunization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

* Fast injection technique without aspiration.
* Oral sucrose 2 minutes before first injection.
* Parent holds infant close.

Tactile stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tactile stimulation added to Standard care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

* Parent rubs the infant's skin near the injection site just before, during and after the injection.
* Fast injection technique without aspiration.
* Oral sucrose 2 minutes before first injection.
* Parent holds infant close.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tactile stimulation added to Standard care

* Parent rubs the infant's skin near the injection site just before, during and after the injection.
* Fast injection technique without aspiration.
* Oral sucrose 2 minutes before first injection.
* Parent holds infant close.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard care

* Fast injection technique without aspiration.
* Oral sucrose 2 minutes before first injection.
* Parent holds infant close.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy infants
* 4 to 6 months old
* routine immunization with DTaP-IPV-Hib and PCV

Exclusion Criteria

* impaired neurological development
* history of seizure
* use of topical local anaesthetics at the injection site
* use of sedatives or narcotics in the preceding 24 hours
* fever or illness that would prevent administration of the vaccine
* parent is unable to use the assessment tools in the study
* parent does not speak English
* prior participation in this trial
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Women's College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Women's College Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna Taddio, B.Sc.Phm, M.Sc., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women's College Hospital Family Practice Health Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-0019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain During Vaccine Administration
NCT05672303 COMPLETED NA