Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 Alone and in Combination With Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (LDAC)in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients

NCT ID: NCT00952588

Last Updated: 2020-02-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD1152 alone and in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) in comparison with LDAC alone in AML patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AZD1152 1200 mg

AZD1152 1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion monotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1152

Intervention Type DRUG

1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion

LDAC 20 mg

LDAC 20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days (400mg per cycle)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LDAC

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AZD1152

1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

LDAC

20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of written informed consent
* Newly diagnosed male or female patients aged 60 and over
* De Novo or Secondary AML
* Not eligible for intensive induction with anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy as a result of at least one of the following:Age ≥75 years; Adverse cytogenetics, e.g., as defined by the MRC Prognostic Groupings; WHO performance status \>2; Organ dysfunction arising from significant co-morbidities not directly linked to leukaemia

Exclusion Criteria

* Participation in another clinical study in which an investigational product was received within 14 days before the first dose in this study, or at any time if the patient has not recovered from side-effects associated with that investigational product
* Administration of LDAC is clinically contraindicated
* Patients with AML of FAB M3 classification Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL)
* Patients with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukaemia
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul Stockman

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Hagop Kantarjian

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Angers, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bologna, BO, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, GE, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Orbassano, TO, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Udine, UD, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yoshida-gun, Fukui, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Chūō, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

TG Mures, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Badalona(barcelona), Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia France Germany Italy Japan Romania Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Quintas-Cardama A, Ravandi F, Liu-Dumlao T, Brandt M, Faderl S, Pierce S, Borthakur G, Garcia-Manero G, Cortes J, Kantarjian H. Epigenetic therapy is associated with similar survival compared with intensive chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012 Dec 6;120(24):4840-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-436055. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23071272 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D1531C00009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of AZD9829 in CD123+ Hematological Malignancies
NCT06179511 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2