Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC™ Disc Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT00931515
Last Updated: 2014-05-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with or without leg pain; with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history, physical examination, radiographic studies showing: decreased disc height, contained herniated nucleus, vacuum phenomenon (dark disc) OR positive discography at the affected level.
These DDD patients should have no more than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level and should have failed at least six months of conservative, non-operative care.
Demonstrate non-inferiority compared to ProDisc.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy With NOVOCART® Disc Plus (ADCT) for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease in Lumbar Spine
NCT01640457
Facet Wedge Post Market Study
NCT02203448
Clinical Trial Based on the Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow in Patients With Lumbar Intervertebral Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01513694
Evaluating The Safety and Effectiveness of The NeoDisc™ Versus ACDF in Subjects With Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease
NCT00478088
Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Multicenter, prospective, randomized (1:1), controlled study comparing the artificial nucleus to ProDisc. After implanting artificial nucleus in two patients during the training session, enrollment of randomized patients shall begin. The study is expected to be completed in four years.
NUMBER OF INVESTIGATIONAL SITES and INVESTIGATORS:
10 - 20 investigational sites, 1 to 2 investigators per site, approximately 20-40 patients per site
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NuBac
NuBac device implanted at the L4/5 level
NuBac
NuBac device implanted at the L4/5 level.
Prodisc-L
Prodisc-L implanted at the L4/5 level.
Prodisc-L
Prodisc-L implanted at the L4/5 level.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NuBac
NuBac device implanted at the L4/5 level.
Prodisc-L
Prodisc-L implanted at the L4/5 level.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* must have symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease at L4/5 requiring surgical treatment
* must have completed a minimum of six months of unsuccessful conservative, non-operative care
* must have discogenic back pain with or without leg pain
* must show radiographic confirmation using plain films, MRI, CT, myelogram or discography of one of the following: decreased disc height when compared to the adjacent level, contained herniated nucleus, or vacuum phenomenon (dark disc)
* must score at least 40% on the Oswestry Disability Index
* must score at least 4 on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale for back pain
* is able to comply with the protocol's follow-up schedule
* must understand and sign the informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* previous fusion at any lumbar level or laminectomy at the target level (discectomy, Intradiscal Electrothermal Annuloplasty, laminotomy, or nucleolysis performed \> 6 months ago are permitted)
* clinically compromised vertebral bodies, at the affected level due to previous trauma, i.e., compression or burst fracture
* pars defect
* involved vertebral endplate dimensionally smaller than 34.5 mm in the medial-lateral direction and/or 27 mm in the anterior-posterior direction
* disc height less than 5 mm at the target level
* bony stenosis
* lytic spondylolisthesis, spondylolisthesis greater than 3mm
* lumbar scoliosis greater than 11 degrees.
* osteoporosis, osteopenia, osteomalacia, Paget's disease or metabolic bone disease
* Schmorl's nodes, an incomplete annulus, or endplates that are not intact
* spinal tumors
* symptomatic facet joint disease
* free fragment herniation confirmed radiographically
* isolated radicular compression syndrome, especially due to a disc herniation
* arachnoiditis
* active infection or surgical site infection
* is using any medication known to interfere with bone/soft tissue healing
* rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease
* systemic disease such as AIDS, HIV, hepatitis
* morbid obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) \>40 or a weight more than 100 lbs over ideal body weight
* psychosocial disorders that would preclude accurate evaluation or has a history of substance abuse
* active malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer; history of any invasive malignancy unless treated and in remission for at least five years
* documented allergies to metal or plastic; i.e., cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, polyethylene, titanium or polyetheretherketone
* pregnancy, or interested in becoming pregnant within the next two years
* prisoner
* involvement in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Songer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopedic Surgery Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Spine Group Beverly Hills
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Tower Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Bergey Spine Institute
Colton, California, United States
Loma Linda University - Faculty Physicians
Loma Linda, California, United States
University of Colorado, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion
Aurora, Colorado, United States
The Spine Institute
Loveland, Colorado, United States
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Tampa, Florida, United States
Bone & Joint Physicians
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
Heartland Hand & Spine Orthopedic Center
Merriam, Kansas, United States
Orthopaedic Surgical Associates
Marquette, Michigan, United States
The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Buffalo Neurosurgery
Buffalo, New York, United States
Southern New York NeuroSurgical Group
Johnson City, New York, United States
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
NeuroSpine Institute
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Neurospine Solutions, PC
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Milwaukee Spinal Specialists
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N012009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.