Efficacy of Computer Delivered Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) (Bup II)

NCT ID: NCT00929253

Last Updated: 2022-05-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to examine the effects of combined buprenorphine and voucher incentives to promote abstinence from illicit opiate use, along with or without computer-delivered therapy, during treatment of opioid dependence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) with contingency management (CM) is a widely researched and demonstrably efficacious drug abuse treatment. This treatment is derived from drug self-administration research and a behavioral analysis of drug dependence, where abused drugs are thought to compete successfully with the more delayed pro-social reinforcers because of their relatively more immediate reinforcing effects. The CRA treatment with CM approach takes this theoretical view into account by (1) providing immediate positive reinforcement for abstinence via the voucher reinforcement procedure, and (2) having therapists teach skills and encourage behaviors that help improve employment status, family/social relations and increase recreational activities via the CRA treatment. The incentives for abstinence with the enhancement of non-drug sources of reinforcement are then expected to successfully compete with the reinforcement from drug use. Adoption of CRA with CM may be facilitated if it could be delivered so that it is both less costly and requires less staff time to implement. In our previous trial, we demonstrated that among buprenorphine maintained opioid-dependent persons, computer-delivered CRA with CM (i.e., voucher incentives) was as effective as and less costly than therapist-delivered CRA with CM (i.e., voucher incentives). However, the design of that study did not indicate whether the computer-delivered CRA produced increases in abstinence over that produced by the CM (i.e., voucher incentives) procedures alone. Thus, we believe the contribution of the computerized treatment to therapeutic outcomes should be isolated.

In this study, which will include only buprenorphine maintained opioid-dependent participants, we plan to examine whether computer-delivered CRA produces increases in abstinence over that produced by CM (i.e., voucher incentives) procedures alone. Specifically, this trial will compare computer-delivered CRA with vouchers (with minimal therapist involvement) and voucher incentives alone in a randomized parallel groups design. Participants will be assigned randomly to receive one of two treatments: (1) computer-delivered CRA along with voucher incentives (i.e., CM); or (2) voucher incentives (i.e., CM) alone. Outcome measures will include abstinence and retention. We hypothesize that the computer-delivered CRA with CM will be more efficacious than CM.

Importantly, in this trial, the treatment interventions will reinforce both cocaine and opioid abstinence. Many opioid-dependent individuals also abuse, or are dependent upon, cocaine and polydrug abuse in this population has been rarely addressed. By targeting both drugs, our understanding of effective ways to address polydrug abuse will be increased.

Overall, this research will contribute new empirical information regarding the efficacy of providing CRA with CM. Such information may result in more cost-effective treatment and facilitate its dissemination. This research will further examine the utility of computerizing a substantive portion of substance abuse treatment. Computerization of treatment is a novel approach that may positively impact the future of drug abuse treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opiate Addiction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer delivered CRA + CM + Suboxone

In this arm, participants are administered Suboxone and therapy is delivered by a computer. Fluency training is provided. The participant then listens through headphones and reads the information on the screen. They progress through various modules that involve education regarding high risk situations for potential use drug and skills to deal with those situations. In addition, skills for dealing with anxiety and anger are also provided. Videos are displayed that have examples of real-left situations. HIV/AIDS education is also provided. The program is interactive with the participant being required to answer short questions at the end of each module and prompts for "homework" worksheets are provided. These participants receive vouchers for providing drug negative urine samples.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suboxone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage Form: Oral Tablet; Dosage 6, 12, or 18 mg; Frequency; Daily; Duration 12 weeks

CRA

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Computer-delivered Community Reinforcement Approach

Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Therapist-delivered therapy

CM

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Contingency management (vouchers) for providing a drug negative urine sample.

CM + Suboxone

In this arm of the study, the participants receive vouchers for providing a drug negative urine sample. These participants, however, do not have computer delivered therapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suboxone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage Form: Oral Tablet; Dosage 6, 12, or 18 mg; Frequency; Daily; Duration 12 weeks

Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Therapist-delivered therapy

CM

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Contingency management (vouchers) for providing a drug negative urine sample.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suboxone

Dosage Form: Oral Tablet; Dosage 6, 12, or 18 mg; Frequency; Daily; Duration 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

CRA

Computer-delivered Community Reinforcement Approach

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Therapy

Therapist-delivered therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

CM

Contingency management (vouchers) for providing a drug negative urine sample.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Buprenorphine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years old and older
* history of opioid dependence
* significant current opioid use

Exclusion Criteria

* unstable medical or psychiatric conditions
* pregnancy
* incarceration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Warren K. Bickel

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Warren K Bickel, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Buchhalter AR, Badger GJ. Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;16(2):132-43. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.132.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18489017 (View on PubMed)

Kirshenbaum AP, Olsen DM, Bickel WK. A quantitative review of the ubiquitous relapse curve. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jan;36(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18571890 (View on PubMed)

Maricich YA, Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Gatchalian K, Botbyl J, Luderer HF. Safety and efficacy of a prescription digital therapeutic as an adjunct to buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Feb;37(2):167-173. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1846022. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33140994 (View on PubMed)

Christensen DR, Landes RD, Jackson L, Marsch LA, Mancino MJ, Chopra MP, Bickel WK. Adding an Internet-delivered treatment to an efficacious treatment package for opioid dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):964-72. doi: 10.1037/a0037496. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25090043 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://fbri.vtc.vt.edu/people-directory/primary-faculty/bickel.html

Click here to learn more about drug addiction studies at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 31695

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CBT4CBT for Office Based Buprenorphine
NCT03580902 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Clinical Rescue Protocol - 2
NCT00000206 COMPLETED PHASE2
Buprenorphine for Prisoners
NCT00574067 COMPLETED PHASE3