Preventing Motor Vehicle Crashes Among Young Drivers: Evaluation of the Checkpoints Program Presented by the American Automobile Association

NCT ID: NCT00920049

Last Updated: 2017-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

830 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-05

Study Completion Date

2012-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

* Automobile crash risks are highest right after licensure and decline rapidly for about 6 months and then gradually for years, regardless of the amount of supervised practice driving or age at licensure. The only approaches to this problem that have demonstrated effectiveness are Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) and parental management.
* The Checkpoints Program consists of persuasive messages and materials designed to increase adoption of the Checkpoints Parent-Teen Driving Agreement and to improve parents' ability to set limits on higher-risk driving privileges for novice drivers. Researchers are interested in determining whether expanding the Checkpoints Program to an online version (instead of through the mail) can help improve parent limit-setting in connection with the program.

Objectives:

* To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of conducting an online version of the Checkpoints Program through American Automobile Association (AAA) clubs.
* To test rates of parental intervention and limit-setting after participation in the Checkpoints Program.

Eligibility:

\- Parents whose teenage children are enrolled in AAA-affiliated driving schools.

Design:

* Parents with children at the permit stage of driver's education will be recruited through AAA clubs and will be asked to visit a designated Web site to sign up for the program.
* Parents will provide consent and complete the baseline survey, and will be assigned to random groups to test different versions of the Checkpoints Program (the intervention or a control group Web site).
* The intervention program will contain videos, regular e-mails, and newsletters on setting parental limits and information on specific teen driving risks. The control program will provide information on various topics related to the licensing procedure and safe driving, but no specific information on teen driving risks.
* A follow-up assessment will be conducted 1 month after the teenager receives his or her license.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Crash risks are highest right after licensure and decline rapidly for about 6 months and then gradually for years, regardless of the amount of supervised practice driving or age at licensure. Graduate Driver Licensing (GDL) and parental management are the only approaches to this problem with demonstrated effectiveness. The Checkpoints Program consists of persuasive messages and materials designed to increase adoption of the Checkpoints Parent-Teen Driving Agreement and increase parent limit setting on higher-risk driving privileges among novice teenage drivers. The current study builds on the results of several previous trials of the Checkpoints Program that have shown significant treatment group effects on parent limit setting, teen risky driving, and violations. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of conducting an online adaptation of the Checkpoints Program through the American Automobile Association (AAA) clubs. The study will be conducted with parents whose teenage children are enrolled in AAA-affiliated driving schools. 800 families will be recruited through AAA Clubs, assigned to intervention or comparison groups, provided online access to Checkpoints or comparison materials, and assessed at baseline and after teen licensure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Persuasion

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The adolescent is between the ages of 15 years 6 months to 17 years 0 month at time of recruitment;
2. The adolescent lives with the parent or legal guardian at least 50% of the time;
3. The parent has routine access to the internet and is able to complete on line surveys in English;
4. A parent or legal guardian agrees to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Germaine M Louis, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), 9000 Rockville

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnett JJ. Developmental sources of crash risk in young drivers. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii17-21; discussion ii21-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12221026 (View on PubMed)

Foss R, Goodwin A. Enhancing the effectiveness of graduated driver licensing legislation. J Safety Res. 2003 Jan;34(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00083-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12535909 (View on PubMed)

Hartos JL, Nissen WJ, Simons-Morton BG. Acceptability of the Checkpoints Parent-Teen Driving Agreement: pilot test. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):138-41. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00330-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11457634 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-CH-N165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

999909165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reducing Driving Offenses of Adolescent Drinkers
NCT00851058 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Smartphone Technology: Young Adult Drinking
NCT02963818 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2