Co-Bedding as a Comfort Measure for Twins Undergoing Painful Procedures

NCT ID: NCT00917631

Last Updated: 2016-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

134 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A rising number of preterm twins, at high risk of undergoing repeated medical procedures often without adequate pain relief, are being admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Skin-to-skin contact between mothers and their infants during painful procedures has been shown to decrease pain and help them stabilize more quickly afterwards. The main question of this study is whether the contact of a twin could provide a similar form of comfort. Sixty-four twin pairs will have an equal chance of undergoing a medically necessary heel stick while being cared for together (co-bedding) or separately. Primary outcome will be physiologic and behavioral pain response. If found to be beneficial, changes to neonatal care practices to include co-bedding may help twins tolerate and recover from painful procedures. Findings will help care providers make recommendations for at risk twins experiencing procedural pain and add to existing theoretical models with respect to the exact mechanism of comfort through touch.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neonatal Procedural Pain Response

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Co-bedding

Twin infants will be placed together in a Incubator or crib lying side-by-side. Twins will be diaper clad and nested together in boundaries consistent with neonatal care practices. All infants will have cardio-respiratory monitoring while co-bedding.

Infants in the co-bedding group be co-bedded for no less than 24 hours prior to heelstick to allow for stabilization following transfer. The heelstick being studied will occur no greater than 10 days following initiation of co-bedding. Duration of co-bedding will be recorded and controlled for in the analysis if necessary.

Monitoring and video-tape recording will take approximately 20-30 minutes per participant - a baseline period (5-10 minutes prior to heel stick), warming (3 minutes), heel stick (2-5 minutes), and recovery phase (approximately 10 minutes).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Co-bedding (caring for twins in the same incubator)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Twin infants will be placed together in a Incubator or crib lying side-by-side. Twins will be diaper clad and nested together in boundaries consistent with neonatal care practices. All infants will have cardio-respiratory monitoring while co-bedding.

Infants in the co-bedding group be co-bedded for no less than 24 hours prior to heelstick to allow for stabilization following transfer. The heelstick being studied will occur no greater than 10 days following initiation of co-bedding. Duration of co-bedding will be recorded and controlled for in the analysis if necessary.

Monitoring and video-tape recording will take approximately 20-30 minutes per participant - a baseline period (5-10 minutes prior to heel stick), warming (3 minutes), heel stick (2-5 minutes), and recovery phase (approximately 10 minutes).

Standard care

For infants who are randomized to receive standard care, the twin pair will remain in separate incubators as per current NICU policy. The infant will be nested in boundaries consistent with neonatal care practices. The heelstick may occur at any time following randomization (within 10 days) to maintain consistency between groups.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Co-bedding (caring for twins in the same incubator)

Twin infants will be placed together in a Incubator or crib lying side-by-side. Twins will be diaper clad and nested together in boundaries consistent with neonatal care practices. All infants will have cardio-respiratory monitoring while co-bedding.

Infants in the co-bedding group be co-bedded for no less than 24 hours prior to heelstick to allow for stabilization following transfer. The heelstick being studied will occur no greater than 10 days following initiation of co-bedding. Duration of co-bedding will be recorded and controlled for in the analysis if necessary.

Monitoring and video-tape recording will take approximately 20-30 minutes per participant - a baseline period (5-10 minutes prior to heel stick), warming (3 minutes), heel stick (2-5 minutes), and recovery phase (approximately 10 minutes).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All medically stable twin infants admitted to the NICU who are:

1. Free from infection; and
2. Breathing room air or receiving oxygen via nasal prongs.
* Twins may be receiving feeds via gavage tubes, IV therapy via peripheral or central line, and may be experiencing periods of apnea.

Exclusion Criteria

* Weigh less than 1000 grams;
* Receiving ventilator support;
* Have chest tubes or umbilical catheter in situ;
* Have major congenital anomalies or chromosomal aberrations; OR
* If only one of the twins require overhead phototherapy.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IWK Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marsha Campbell-Yeo

Neonatal Nurse Practitioner

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marsha L Campbell-Yeo, MN NNP-BC PhDc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IWK Health Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IWK Health Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campbell-Yeo ML, Johnston CC, Joseph KS, Feeley N, Chambers CT, Barrington KJ, Walker CD. Co-bedding between preterm twins attenuates stress response after heel lance: results of a randomized trial. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jul;30(7):598-604. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24300226 (View on PubMed)

Campbell-Yeo ML, Johnston CC, Joseph KS, Feeley N, Chambers CT, Barrington KJ. Cobedding and recovery time after heel lance in preterm twins: results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):500-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0010. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22926182 (View on PubMed)

Campbell-Yeo ML, Johnston CC, Joseph K, Feeley NL, Chambers CT, Barrington KJ. Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial). BMC Pediatr. 2009 Dec 11;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-76.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20003351 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#4382

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.