The Effects of Different Procedures on Pain Levels at Preterm and Term Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT05077345

Last Updated: 2022-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

196 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-15

Study Completion Date

2020-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Accurate assessment of pain in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is vital because of the high prevalence of painful experiences, including both daily procedural pain and postoperative pain, in this population. It has been reported that newborns born between the gestational ages (GY) 25-42 and hospitalized in the NICU undergo an average of 14 painful procedures per day in the first 2 weeks of life. The aim of this study is determinin the effect of different procedures on the pain levels of newborns in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Accurate assessment of pain in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is vital because of the high prevalence of painful experiences, including both daily procedural pain and postoperative pain, in this population. Exposure of these infants to many mandatory invasive procedures and poor pain management during this time may lead to different results in the short and long term. Every painful application in newborns causes behavioral and physiological instability. Repeated exposure to painful stimuli produces long-term changes in stress-sensitive brain systems such as the hypothalamic-adrenal system and the developing brain. Therefore, evaluation and prevention of pain in newborns is essential. In the NICU, many medical interventions are often performed on infants that are repetitive, painful, but diagnostically necessary. All environmental stress factors can cause physiological changes such as increased pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate and a decrease in oxygen saturation in newborns. Increasing energy expenditure to overcome these changes may affect physiological functioning, slowing recovery and adversely affecting the organization of the central nervous system (CNS). Heel blood (TC), vascular access (DY), naso and orogastric (NG-OG) catheter insertion, arterial blood collection, tracheal intubation (TE), various rectal procedures, removal of adhesive tapes, umbilical catheter (UK) insertion and removal, Various procedures such as aspiration, chest physiotherapy applications, diaper changing, various hand contacts, and general body care may induce pain responses in newborns. While these responses are associated with low cognitive and motor scores in early childhood, they may result in changes in visual-perceptual ability and somatosensory sensitivity later on. There are many studies in the literature to increase and prove the accuracy of pain assessment tools. However, since the pain treatments used in these studies were also varied, the homogeneity of the evaluations was insufficient. Therefore, more systematic evaluation studies should be conducted on how to improve pain management in NICUs. Finding which of the painful stimuli affects infants more will also guide the use of treatment methods. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different procedures applied in the NICU on the pain levels of term and preterm infants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Newborn Preterm Term Venipuncture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1/Venous blood sampling

The vessel was determined for cannulation and an anatomical tourniquet was applied. Skin antiseptic was prepared. The plastic wings of the winged angioket were held open. The skin over the vein to be accessed was stretched with the fingers of the free hand. The needle was inserted into the skin a few millimeters distal to the point to be inserted, and the blood was vascularized until the education. The cannula was advanced by retracting the stylet. The tourniquet was removed and the cannula was fixed.

No interventions assigned to this group

2/Heel puncture

The skin was prepared with an antiseptic. The baby's heel was placed at an angle between the thumb and forefinger, with the other fingers grasping the ankle from behind. Pressure was applied to the back of the ankle with the other fingers by taking support against the thumb. The first drop of blood was wiped with sterile gauze by inserting the needle, and the next drops of blood were absorbed into the paper by touching the middle of the ring on the filter paper. An adhesive bandage was applied by applying pressure to the puncture site.

No interventions assigned to this group

3:Orogastric Catheter insertion

The head of the bed was raised and the newborn was placed on his back. The midpoint distance from the tip of the nose to the ear, xiphoid and umbilicus was measured to determine the insertion length. With one hand, the infant's mouth was opened while his head was stabilized. With the other hand, the MV probe was advanced to the specified depth. The position of the OG probe was confirmed and fixed.

No interventions assigned to this group

4:Umbilical Catheter insertion

The system was filled with liquid by connecting the tap to the UK. The faucet was turned off, sterile gauze was placed around the umbilical clamp and lifted out of the sterile area. The other assistant held the cord with a clamp and lifted it vertically up and away from the sterile field. The cord and its surroundings were prepared with an antiseptic solution and covered. The umbilicus was tied with a single knot and the cord was cut horizontally with a scalpel. Bleeding on the surface of the cord was wiped with sterile gauze. The cord stump was grasped with toothed forceps close to the vessel to be catheterized. The catheter was placed in the lumen of the vessel and advanced in the vessel. When the catheter exceeded 5 cm, it was aspirated to confirm the intraluminal position. The blood that came with an average of 0.5 ml bolus solution was cleaned and the catheter was fixed.

No interventions assigned to this group

5:Tracheal Intubation

The head of the infant was positioned in the midline, slightly extended, with the chin up. The head was stabilized with the right hand by turning on the light of the laryngoscope. The blade of the laryngoscope was inserted by sliding the blade over the tongue until the tip of the blade rested on the Vallecula. The blade of the laryngoscope was slid up to open the mouth even more. The other assistant gently dipped it into the suprasternal notch. The concave edge of the tube was held with the right hand, and it was advanced approximately 2 cm, passing it between the vocal cords when the vocal cords and trachea were seen.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preterm and term infants admitted to the NICU for the first time for various reasons with a hospital stay ranging from 1 to 8 days
* Preterm and term infants who were cared for in an incubator without any pharmacological or non-pharmacological analgesic therapy, muscle relaxant, and sedation treatment in the last 24 hours before the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Exposed to painful procedures more than 3 times in the same day
* Infants who diagnosed with osteomyelitis, sepsis, pyejonic arthritis, congenital anomaly (Spina bifida, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita)
* Infants with any known neurological diagnosis (Abnormal MRI finding, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, asphyxia, periventricular leukomolacia (PVL), acute bilirubin encephalopathy, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE))
* Infants who had any surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sanko University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hatice Adiguzel, PT

Assistant Proffessor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

hatice Adiguzel, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

mehmet Egilmez, PT

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sanko University

Nevin Ergun, Proffessor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sanko University

Yusuf Unal Sarıkabadayi, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sanko University

Bulent Elbasan, Proffessor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gazi University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hatice Adıgüzel

Gaziantep, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KSU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nonpharmacological Pain Management in Neonates
NCT06155825 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA