Continuous Preperitoneal Infusion of Local Anesthetic (CPA) Versus Epidural Infusion of Local Anesthetic (EA) in Fast-Track Open Colorectal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00915265

Last Updated: 2018-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the continuous preperitoneal infusion of local anesthetic and continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management in fast-track open colorectal surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Optimized pain relief allowing early mobilization is a prerequisite for enhanced recovery after surgery. Open colorectal surgery is associated with severe and prolonged postoperative pain, especially during mobilization. No analgesic technique has fulfilled all requirements of optimal efficacy: no side effects, low costs, high patient compliance, and improvement in outcome, and consequently, multimodal analgesic techniques have been introduced with a focus on opioid sparing to improve analgesia and recovery. Epidural analgesia (EA) has shown a marked benefit in controlling pain at mobilization, and significantly improves pain management when compared with systemic patient-controlled morphine analgesia. However, eligible patients may not benefit from it because of technical problems or failure of efficiency. Recently, continuous preperitoneal infusion of local anesthetic (CPA) has been shown to be an effective method to relief pain after open colorectal surgery, to reduced morphine consumption and accelerated postoperative recovery. However, this technique has never been evaluated in a fast-track program (ERAS protocol). Moreover, continuous preperitoneal infusions of local anesthetic and epidural analgesia have never been compared.

The purpose of this randomized and double-blinded study is to compare these two techniques on pain control during mobilization, as a prerequisite for enhanced recovery after open colorectal surgery: 1- CPA group: continuous preperitoneal administration of 0.2% ropivacaine using a multilobed catheter positioned between the previously closed parietal peritoneum and the underside of the transversalis fascia + intravenous morphine (patient-controlled analgesia, PCA) as a rescue; 2- EA group: epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (patient-controlled epidural analgesia, PCEA) + continuous preperitoneal administration of 0.9% saline.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Open Colorectal Surgery Early Rehabilitation After Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multilobed catheter (group CPA)

\- CPA group: continuous preperitoneal administration of 0.2% ropivacaine using a multilobed catheter positioned between the previously closed parietal peritoneum and the underside of the transversalis fascia

Intervention Type OTHER

Multilobed catheter (group EA)

EA group : thoracic epidural infusion of 0.2 % ropivacaine

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Open colorectal surgery through a midline incision with a primary anastomosis
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III

Exclusion Criteria

* Obesity (body mass index \> 35 kg/m2)
* Pregnancy
* Inflammatory bowel diseases
* Contraindication for epidural analgesia (patient refusal, active sepsis, coagulopathy)
* Chronic renal failure (with creatinin clearance \< 30 ml/min)
* Significant hepatic failure (prothrombin ratio \< 50%, factor V \< 50%)
* Chronic pain
* Preoperative opioid consumption
* Preoperative cognitive dysfunction
* Preoperative psychiatric disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emmanuel FUTIER, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patrick Lacarin

Role: CONTACT

04.73.75.11.95

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick Lacarin

Role: primary

0473751195

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jouve P, Bazin JE, Petit A, Minville V, Gerard A, Buc E, Dupre A, Kwiatkowski F, Constantin JM, Futier E. Epidural versus continuous preperitoneal analgesia during fast-track open colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):622-30. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182800d94.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23426208 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHU-0052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mechanical Bowel Prep Randomized Study
NCT04931173 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA