Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1062 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-31
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylatic Effect Preoperative Antibiotics With Mechanical Bowel Preparation in SSIs: A Propensity Analysis
NCT04258098
Prophylatic Effect Preoperative Antibiotics With Mechanical Bowel Preparation in SSIs
NCT03856671
Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery
NCT00288496
Neomycin and Metronidazole Hydrochloride With or Without Polyethylene Glycol in Reducing Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery
NCT03042091
Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT03491540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: Therefore, the objectives are to conduct a multi-centre, parallel, two arm, non-inferiority RCT comparing IVA+MBP+OA versus IVA+OA to reduce SSI following colon surgery.
Methods: The inclusion criteria are any patient (i) undergoing elective colon surgery, (ii) over the age of 18 years and (3) provides informed consent. Eligible patients at 4 centres across Canada will be randomized to one of two groups: IVA+OA+MBP or IVA+OA. The primary outcome for the trial is the overall rate of SSI at 30 days following surgery. Assuming an overall SSI rate of 7% with IVA+MBP+OA and a non-inferiority margin of 4.0%, 1062 patients will be required with a one sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80%. This non-inferiority margin was unanimously accepted as clinically meaningful by all of the Site Leads at participating centres. Primary analyses will be performed per-protocol in patients who received treatment as allocated and underwent colon surgery. Overall SSI rates at 30 days following surgery will be compared using a general linear model and non-inferiority will be declared if the upper limit of the one sided 95% confidence interval of the absolute risk difference of overall SSI following surgery does not include 4.0%.
Relevance: This trial will be highly relevant to both patients and physicians as the results will provide definitive, high quality, patient-centred evidence about whether MBP is a necessary part of the optimal bowel preparation to reduce SSI and improve both patient experience and outcomes. These results will have significant potential to change practice in Canada and world-wide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: IV and Oral antibiotics (IVA+OA)
Patients will receive cefazolin 2g IV and metronidazole 500 mg IV administered by the anesthesiologist within 60 minutes prior to the skin incision on the day of surgery. Standardized re-dosing of cefazolin 2g IV will occur every 4 hours and metronidazole 500 mg IV will occur every 8 hours during the surgical procedure. Following surgery, no further IVA will be given for SSI prophylaxis. In addition, patients will self-administer 1g neomycin and 1g metronidazole orally at 1500, 1700 and 2300 hours the day before surgery. Following this, they will not receive any further OAs for SSI prophylaxis.
IVA+OA versus IVA+MBP+OA
Non-inferiority RCT comparing IVA+OA+MBP vs IVA+OA to reduce surgical site infection following colon surgery
Group B: IV antibiotics, MBP and oral antibiotics (IVA+MBP+OA)
Patients will receive IVA and OA per Group A. In addition, patients will stay on clear fluids and self-administer a 2L polyethylene glycol MBP orally, between 1500 and 2300 hours on the day before surgery.
IVA+OA versus IVA+MBP+OA
Non-inferiority RCT comparing IVA+OA+MBP vs IVA+OA to reduce surgical site infection following colon surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IVA+OA versus IVA+MBP+OA
Non-inferiority RCT comparing IVA+OA+MBP vs IVA+OA to reduce surgical site infection following colon surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* over the age of 18 years
* provides informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy or lactation
* chronic renal failure (serum creatinine \> 220 umol/L).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erin Kennedy
Colorectal Surgeon; Department Head, Division of General Surgery
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Willis MA, Toews I, Soltau SL, Kalff JC, Meerpohl JJ, Vilz TO. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 7;2(2):CD014909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014909.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PJT-165836
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.