An Upgrading of the Resuscitative Patterns by Utilization of the Balanced Crystalloids and Synthetic Colloids and the Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring During Burn Shock
NCT ID: NCT00914563
Last Updated: 2009-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Introduction: The goal of this trial is the verification, optional upgrading and optimizing of the resuscitative patterns in light of the new generation of balanced crystalloids and colloids and, by utilization the non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring LIDCO.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Fluid Resuscitation With Balanced HES 130/0.4 [6%] in Severe Burn Injury
NCT01012648
Lithium Dilution Method in Guiding Fluid Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00626756
Fluid Resuscitation in Burn Patients
NCT03118362
Fluid Shifts During Resuscitation: Impacts on Macrocirculation and Microcirculation
NCT00326729
Blood Gas Analysis and Buffering In Cardiac Arrest
NCT01362556
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conclusions: We will evaluate the total fluid balance at day 1, 2 and cumulative fluid balance at day 7, reversal of organ dysfunction according to SOFA score at day 3 and 7 in both group. The days of invasive ventilatory support, length of ICU stay, ICU survival, total length of hospital stay and hospital survival are the additional endpoints.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LIDCO
The extensively burnt patients (age range 18-75 years) with second and the third degree burns, with TBSA above 15%, with or without inhalation injury will be included to the study. We will compare the standard monitored and volume resuscitated group of patients with the LIDCO monitored group. We will use in the LIDCO group the continuous real-time hemodynamic monitoring through transpulmonal lithium dilution additionally. The monitor Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output (LIDCO) Plus permits, through analysis of the arterial blood pressure trace, to acquire items about CO, SVR and DO2. In fluid resuscitation, we will use a combination of the balanced crystalloids and synthetic colloids (of the middle molecular weight) in the ratio 2 ml/kg/% TBSA: 1 ml/kg/% TBSA.
LIDCO Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output
Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output (LIDCO) Plus permits through analysis of the arterial blood pressure trace to acquire items about CO, SVR and DO2.
Standard care
We will compare the standard monitored and volume resuscitated group of patients with the LIDCO monitored group. The control group will be composed of the patients supervised in a standard way, volume resuscitated according to the Brooke or Parkland formulas.
Standard Care
We will compare the standard monitored and volume resuscitated group of patients with the LIDCO monitored group. The control group will be composed of the patients supervised in a standard way, volume resuscitated according to the Brooke or Parkland formulas.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LIDCO Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output
Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output (LIDCO) Plus permits through analysis of the arterial blood pressure trace to acquire items about CO, SVR and DO2.
Standard Care
We will compare the standard monitored and volume resuscitated group of patients with the LIDCO monitored group. The control group will be composed of the patients supervised in a standard way, volume resuscitated according to the Brooke or Parkland formulas.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* with TBSA above 15%
* with or without inhalation injury
* with surgically insoluble extent of burns
* dialyzed patients will be excluded
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cartotto RC, Innes M, Musgrave MA, Gomez M, Cooper AB. How well does the Parkland formula estimate actual fluid resuscitation volumes? J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 Jul-Aug;23(4):258-65. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200207000-00006.
Holm C, Melcer B, Horbrand F, von Donnersmarck GH, Muhlbauer W. The relationship between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption during fluid resuscitation of burn-related shock. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000 Mar-Apr;21(2):147-54. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200021020-00011.
Holm C, Melcer B, Horbrand F, Worl H, von Donnersmarck GH, Muhlbauer W. Intrathoracic blood volume as an end point in resuscitation of the severely burned: an observational study of 24 patients. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):728-34. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00023.
Holm C, Mayr M, Tegeler J, Horbrand F, Henckel von Donnersmarck G, Muhlbauer W, Pfeiffer UJ. A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation. Burns. 2004 Dec;30(8):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.016.
Huang Y, Yan B, Yang Z. Clinical study of a formula for delayed rapid fluid resuscitation for patients with burn shock. Burns. 2005 Aug;31(5):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.02.002.
Ahrns KS. Trends in burn resuscitation: shifting the focus from fluids to adequate endpoint monitoring, edema control, and adjuvant therapies. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2004 Mar;16(1):75-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2003.09.007.
Mitra B, Fitzgerald M, Cameron P, Cleland H. Fluid resuscitation in major burns. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):35-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03641.x.
Berger MM, Bernath MA, Chiolero RL. Resuscitation, anaesthesia and analgesia of the burned patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001 Aug;14(4):431-5. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200108000-00009.
Czermak C, Hartmann B, Scheele S, Germann G, Kuntscher MV. [Burn shock fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic monitoring]. Chirurg. 2004 Jun;75(6):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0859-z. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FH Kralovske Vinohrady
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.