Optima: Optimizing Prograf Therapy in Maintenance Allografts II
NCT ID: NCT00905515
Last Updated: 2023-09-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-08-31
2008-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimizing Prograf® Therapy in Renal Transplant Patients
NCT00297765
A Study to Compare the Conversion to Prograf® (Tacrolimus) to the Continuation of Cyclosporine in Patients at Risk for Chronic Renal Allograft Failure
NCT00510913
Tacrolimus as Secondary Intervention vs. Continuation of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Patients With Chronic Renal Allograft Failure (CRAF)
NCT00637143
A Study in Kidney Transplant Subjects to Investigate the Optimal Suppression of Immunity to Help Prevent Kidney Rejection
NCT00717470
Comparison of the Two Immunosuppressive Regimens Based on Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Following Kidney Transplantation
NCT00204191
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of premature death in renal and other transplant recipients. Current immunosuppressive protocols often elevate cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes.
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens to ensure the best possible long-term outcomes after renal transplantation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group Cyclosporine
Maintain on Cyclosporine (CsA) at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL.
cyclosporine
Maintain on cyclosporine at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL.
Low Trough Level Prograf Group
Convert to Prograf (TAC) at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL.
Prograf (Tacrolimus)
Convert to Prograf at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL (Arm 2) or target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL (Arm 3).
High Trough Level Prograf Group
Convert to TAC at target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL.
Prograf (Tacrolimus)
Convert to Prograf at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL (Arm 2) or target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL (Arm 3).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cyclosporine
Maintain on cyclosporine at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL.
Prograf (Tacrolimus)
Convert to Prograf at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL (Arm 2) or target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL (Arm 3).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient was 18 years of age at time of transplant.
* Patient is at least 6 months post-transplant.
* Patient has been on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen since the transplant.
* Patient has a functioning allograft and a Cockcroft/Gault estimate of creatinine clearance \>or= 35 mL/min within four weeks prior to randomization.
* Patient or legal guardian has signed and dated an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent document and is willing and able to follow study procedures.
* Females are not pregnant and agree to practice effective birth control while receiving immunosuppressant medication.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient experienced biopsy-confirmed, acute rejection, (Banff 97 criteria)within 3 months before randomization that required treatment, which is defined as antilymphocyte therapy, corticosteroids, or an increase in the number or dose of immunosuppressant medication.
* Patient has recurrence of primary renal disease, or de novo renal disease.
* Patient has a urine protein of \> 1.5g/24 hours or two successive urinalyses sent to and reported by the laboratory indicating albuminuria greater than 2+ within 6 months prior to enrollment.
* Patient has an estimated creatinine clearance \< 35 mL/min calculated using Cockcroft/Gault formula within four weeks prior to randomization.
* Patient has changed adjunctive immunosuppressant therapy within one month if randomization.
* Patient is pregnant or lactating.
* Patient is a known carrier of any of the HIV viruses.
* Patient has a known or suspected malignancy (except for treated squamous or basal cell skin cancers) \< 5 years before randomization or a history of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).
* Patient has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, or any of the excipients of the drug.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
INDUSTRY
East Carolina University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Bolin
Chair of Internal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Bolin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
East Carolina University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):221-6. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34487.
Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, Vincenti F, Filo RS. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation. 1997 Apr 15;63(7):977-83. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199704150-00013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MR-06-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.