Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee

NCT ID: NCT00904462

Last Updated: 2010-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

224 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine 5% patch

Lidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidoderm

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

Placebo patch

Matching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo patch

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidoderm

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo patch

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine 5% patch

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA
2. Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
3. Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
4. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter \[OTC\] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain
5. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary
6. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had, at the baseline visit, an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
2. Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results
3. Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
4. Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min)
5. Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
6. Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
7. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the placebo run-in period.
8. Were using lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued during the study
9. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA
10. Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry
11. Were unable to discontinue use of topical drugs applied to the knee
12. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Endo Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Endo Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tallassee, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Peabody, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bartlett, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cordova, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EN3260-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.