Lidocaine Patch Versus Celecoxib in Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT ID: NCT00904605
Last Updated: 2010-02-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-06-30
2004-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee
NCT00904462
Efficacy and Safety of the Lidoderm Patch Applied to Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT00589979
Safety and Efficacy of Celecoxib Versus Naproxen in the 6-month Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT00643799
The Efficacy of Diclofenac Gel for Breakthrough Pain and the Neuropathic Components of Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01383954
Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Who Were Unresponsive to Naproxen and Ibuprofen
NCT00640627
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1- Lidoderm®
Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied topically to each affected knee every 24 hours (q24h)
Lidoderm
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg daily. Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied topically to each affected knee every 24 hours (q24h
2-Celecoxib 200mg
Celecoxib (Celebrex®, G.D. Searle \& Co., Chicago, IL), one 200 mg oral capsule QD
Celecoxib
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg daily. Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied topically to each affected knee every 24 hours (q24h)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidoderm
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg daily. Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied topically to each affected knee every 24 hours (q24h
Celecoxib
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine patch 5% or celecoxib 200 mg daily. Lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied topically to each affected knee every 24 hours (q24h)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
3. Had a normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
4. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter \[OTC\] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non-study pain)
5. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to active treatment if they had an average daily pain intensity score for the index joint of 5 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately preceding the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary.
6. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to active treatment if they had an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee
Exclusion Criteria
2. Had elective surgery scheduled to occur during the 14-week study
3. Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that may confound study results
4. Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
5. Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min)
6. Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
7. Had experienced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs
8. Had a prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or gastrointestinal bleeding
9. Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
10. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the washout period.
11. Were receiving fluconazole or lithium (secondary to drug-drug-interaction risks)
12. Were taking a lidocaine-containing products that could not be discontinued during the study
13. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA
14. Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry
15. Were unable to discontinue use of topic drugs applied to the knee
16. Had previously failed treatment with celecoxib or with two COX-2 specific inhibitors other than celecoxib
17. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endo Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sr. Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hueytown, Alabama, United States
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Oro Valley, Arizona, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Carlsbad, California, United States
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Inverness, Florida, United States
Melbourne, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Port Orange, Florida, United States
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Marietta, Georgia, United States
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
Clemmons, North Carolina, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Johnstown, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EN3220-012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.