Procedure Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA) and Hospitalization of Short Duration
NCT ID: NCT00890851
Last Updated: 2009-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-31
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transurethral Ventral Wall of Urethra-preserving Enucleation of Prostate
NCT01073241
Transurethral Resection Versus Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Randomized Study
NCT05330156
Real-Time (TRUS) Guidance in Endoscopic Treatment of BPH
NCT06922968
Transperineal Laser Ablation vs Transurethral Resection for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04781049
Transurethral Prostate Resection (TURP) vs. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE)
NCT05531240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective one: To test the feasibility of a procedure TUNA at the time of a hospitalization of less 24h.
Number of patients: A sample of N=70 patients will make it possible to estimate the frequency of success with a precision of ± 10% for any frequency higher than 75%.
Analyse statistical: Principal analyze: Count held of the aim of the study the principal analyses will be descriptives. For the variables qualitative or semi-quantitative bilateral the confidence frequencies and their interval at 95% (IC95) will be presented. If the conditions of use of the asymptotic estimators would not be filled, of the exact estimators will be used. For the quantitative averages and IC95%, median variables and outdistances interquartile will be calculated. Together analyses will be presented for the general population and by center.
Secondary analyze: In case of rate of important failure, an exploratory analysis at end of identification of the predictive factors of failure will be made by analysis in multivariate logistic regression.
Awaited results: The precise evaluation carried out by the present study will make it possible to evaluate the benefit report/ratio risks in the short run procedure and its feasibility within the framework of a hospitalization in surgery ambulatory. The implications are important. Indeed, if this technique can be done into ambulatory with a high rate of success, then this technique of treatment could be proposed in alternative of the medical treatment or to the bad responders with the medical treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Procedure TUNA
Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA)
Transurethral needle ablation of benign prostatic hyperplasia by radio frequencies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA)
Transurethral needle ablation of benign prostatic hyperplasia by radio frequencies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient presenting an anaesthetic risk of ASA 1 at 3
3. Patient accepting the protocol, in particular the return to residence with a sounder
4. Patient presenting a TUBA related to a HBP and lasting since more than 3 months
1. with a gene score higher superior or egal to 3
2. with a score IPS superior to 8
5. Patient presenting a prostate whose estimated weight is inferior or egal to 80g, without median lobe prevailing and whose transverse width lies between 34 and 80 mm.
6. Patient having a residue post mictional lower than 200cc.
7. Patient presenting a normal renal function
8. Patient having a result PSA £ 4 ng/ml, or negative biopsies if PSA \> 4 and \< 10 ng/ml
9. Patient having given his free and in writing lit assent
10. Patient affiliated to the Social security or an assimilated mode
11. Patient having stopped his treatment by 5 alpha reductase since at least a month (1)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient presenting an acute retention of urine
3. Patient presenting a neurological bladder and/or of an anomaly of the sphincter
4. Patient currently under anticoagulant treatment.
5. Patient currently under anti-inflammatory treatment.
6. Patient presenting an affection or a confirmed or suspected malignant tumour of the prostates or vegie.
7. Patient presenting an antecedent of surgery prostatic
8. Patient presenting of the biopsies prostate sufferers carried out less than 4 months before procedure TUNA
9. Patient introducing of the antecedents of vesical lithiasis, haematuria important, contracting of the urethra, stenosis of the vesical collar, pathologies of the bladder or sweetened diabetes affecting vesical operation,
10. Patient presenting a prosthesis in the zone being able to be affected by the procedure
11. Patient presenting a desire of fertility
12. Patient presenting an anorectal pathology
13. Patient presenting an allergy to the anaesthesia locale
14. Patient whose follow-up seems incompatible with the needs for the study
45 Years
85 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of clinical research and development
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bertrand LUKACS, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital TENON - Service d'Urologie
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P050302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.