Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Pain, Responders and Non-Responders?

NCT ID: NCT00885859

Last Updated: 2009-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

* Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a frequently applied therapy in chronic pain. Although evidence regarding the effectiveness of TENS in chronic pain is inconclusive many patients continue using TENS on long term in daily practice. An important question is therefore why some patients respond well and others don't at all. In chronic pain evidence for abnormal pain processing (sensitization) has been found in several patients groups. The process of sensitization might influence effectiveness of TENS as the theoretical working mechanism of TENS is based on the modulation of the transmission of nociceptive impulses form peripheral receptors throughout spinal nerve system into the brain. In this study we want to study the effect of TENS on pain transmission, as measured by contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPS), between 'responders' and non-responders' after a two weeks TENS treatment. 'Responders' will be defined as patients with a pain reduction of ≥ 30% on a VAS after a two week treatment period with TENS. Non-responders are patients with a pain reduction \< 15%.
* Objective: a) Is pain reducing effect TENS in responders based on modulation of pain transmission and perception, as measured by CHEPS? b) Is the ability of TENS to modulate pain transmission and perception influenced by abnormal pain processing?
* Prospective cohort study
* Patients with chronic non specific pain (duration \> 6 months), above 18 year, will be included. Patients are referred from the Pain Clinic of the University Hospital Maastricht (MUMC). Exclusion criteria are: a) pain due to cancer, b) the use of a cardiac pacemaker, c) pregnancy, d) neurological sensory deficits, e) language and/or cognitive inability to complete the health assessment questionnaires f) previous TENS for pain relief.
* Patients receive a two week treatment period with TENS-treatment, as regular, at home after instruction. The frequency is set at 100 Hz and pulse duration at 250 μ sec. Patients have to use the TENS daily (minimal 4 times a day for 30 minutes).

Main study parameters/endpoints are decrease in amplitude of CHEPS in responders versus non-responders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain Lower Back Pain Shoulder Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

responders: patients who have a pain reduction of 30% or more after two weeks TENS-treatment

TENStemeco Schwa Medico [Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)]

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients are instructed how to use the TENS device during the two weeks at home.Self-adhesive reusable electrodes are used to deliver the electrical stimulation. The frequency is 100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μ sec. Stimulus intensity is strong but not unpleasant. The TENS electrodes are attached proximally and distally around the maximum pain point/area. Patients use TENS 4 times daily (30 minutes each time).

2

non-responders: patient who have a pain reduction smaller than 15% after two weeks TENS-treatment

TENStemeco Schwa Medico [Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)]

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients are instructed how to use the TENS device during the two weeks at home.Self-adhesive reusable electrodes are used to deliver the electrical stimulation. The frequency is 100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μ sec. Stimulus intensity is strong but not unpleasant. The TENS electrodes are attached proximally and distally around the maximum pain point/area. Patients use TENS 4 times daily (30 minutes each time).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TENStemeco Schwa Medico [Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)]

Patients are instructed how to use the TENS device during the two weeks at home.Self-adhesive reusable electrodes are used to deliver the electrical stimulation. The frequency is 100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μ sec. Stimulus intensity is strong but not unpleasant. The TENS electrodes are attached proximally and distally around the maximum pain point/area. Patients use TENS 4 times daily (30 minutes each time).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TENStemeco Schwa Medico

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* referred for TENS treatment by a pain physician,
* duration of pain \> 6 months,
* age above 18,
* no current other treatment for pain besides pain medication. Patients are allowed to continue their regular pain medication (as described by physician) prior to the TENS treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* pain due to cancer,
* the use of a cardiac pacemaker,
* pregnancy,
* neurological sensory deficits,
* language and/or cognitive inability to complete the health assessment questionnaires
* previous TENS for pain relief.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MaatrichtUMC

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maarten van Kleef, Phd, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MaastrichtUMC

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Albere Koke, MSc, PT

Role: CONTACT

+310433877659

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Albere Koke, Msc, PT

Role: primary

+31433877659

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Buonocore M, Camuzzini N. Increase of the heat pain threshold during and after high-frequency transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in a group of normal subjects. Eura Medicophys. 2007 Jun;43(2):155-60. Epub 2006 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17021587 (View on PubMed)

de Tommaso M, Fiore P, Camporeale A, Guido M, Libro G, Losito L, Megna M, Puca F, Megna G. High and low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation inhibits nociceptive responses induced by CO2 laser stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003 May 15;342(1-2):17-20. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00219-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12727307 (View on PubMed)

de Tommaso M, Shevel E, Pecoraro C, Sardaro M, Divenere D, Di Fruscolo O, Lamberti P, Livrea P. Intra-oral orthosis vs amitriptyline in chronic tension-type headache: a clinical and laser evoked potentials study. Head Face Med. 2006 May 25;2:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16725028 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC 09-2-025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Electromyographic Response to TsDcs in CNSLBP
NCT06712992 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA