Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Advanced Cancer Pain Patients
NCT ID: NCT02655289
Last Updated: 2018-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a complementary treatment option for patients who experience suboptimal pain control. However, the evidence for the efficacy of TENS in cancer patients is not unambiguous.
The present study is a double blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial with a short-term follow-up.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TENS for cancer pain reduction in advanced cancer patients.
The secondary aim is the explorative identification of subgroups that benefit or do not benefit from TENS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PENS or TENS for Pain in Liver Cancer
NCT03338543
Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation or Acupressure on Pain in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
NCT07051265
Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling?
NCT02005354
Comparison of High Tone Therapy and TENS Therapy
NCT03978585
Using TENS to Relieve Pain and Potentiate the Rehabilitation of Pain Patients
NCT02445677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Modulated TENS
Modulated TENS
* Frequency: 100 Hz
* Intensity: individual; TENS should be clearly perceptible but not painful; impulse width is coupled with intensity
* Mode: intensity modulation (40% decrease every 0.5 seconds)
* TENS device: ARTROSTIM® SELECT
* Channels: 2
* Electrodes: 4 (5x5cm), placed on site of pain (a little more proximal if allodynia is present)
Placebo TENS
Placebo TENS
* Frequency: 100 Hz (conventional for High TENS; Placebo is achieved by reduction of intensity, see below)
* Intensity: The device is on and will be up-regulated together until the first sensation is perceptible. Then the activated device will be down-regulated minimally (no sensation perceptible) and this configuration will be retained.
* Mode: continuous
* TENS device: ARTROSTIM® SELECT
* Channels: 2
* Electrodes: 4 (5x5cm), placed on site of pain (a little proximal if allodynia is present)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modulated TENS
* Frequency: 100 Hz
* Intensity: individual; TENS should be clearly perceptible but not painful; impulse width is coupled with intensity
* Mode: intensity modulation (40% decrease every 0.5 seconds)
* TENS device: ARTROSTIM® SELECT
* Channels: 2
* Electrodes: 4 (5x5cm), placed on site of pain (a little more proximal if allodynia is present)
Placebo TENS
* Frequency: 100 Hz (conventional for High TENS; Placebo is achieved by reduction of intensity, see below)
* Intensity: The device is on and will be up-regulated together until the first sensation is perceptible. Then the activated device will be down-regulated minimally (no sensation perceptible) and this configuration will be retained.
* Mode: continuous
* TENS device: ARTROSTIM® SELECT
* Channels: 2
* Electrodes: 4 (5x5cm), placed on site of pain (a little proximal if allodynia is present)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: ≥ 18 years
* Patients receive at least 24 hours palliative care: on palliative care ward, palliative care consultant service or acute pain consultant service
Exclusion Criteria
* High probability of dying within the next week
* Pain that is not directly or indirectly related to tumor
Contraindications: Jones (2009) \& Disselhoff (2012)
* electronic implants like pacemakers
* Metal implant on electrode site
* Arrhythmia
* Pregnancy
* Epilepsy
* Dermatological conditions or frail skin on electrode site
* Anamnestically known distinct allergy regarding electrodes
Drop-out criteria after inclusion:
* Patients that decide to stop TENS treatment (at any time or any reason).
* Further treatment is not indicated due a rapid deterioration of the patients' clinical status according to the treating physician.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Freiburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Waldemar Siemens
MSc
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gerhild Becker, Prof., MD, MA, MSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Medical Center Freiburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, University of Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Radbruch L, Nauck F, Ostgathe C, Elsner F, Bausewein C, Fuchs M, Lindena G, Neuwohner K, Schulenberg D. What are the problems in palliative care? Results from a representative survey. Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jul;11(7):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0472-6. Epub 2003 May 28.
Hurlow A, Bennett MI, Robb KA, Johnson MI, Simpson KH, Oxberry SG. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD006276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub3.
Bennett MI, Hughes N, Johnson MI. Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: low fidelity may explain negative findings. Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
Bennett MI, Johnson MI, Brown SR, Radford H, Brown JM, Searle RD. Feasibility study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. J Pain. 2010 Apr;11(4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance: Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DRKS00007990
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.