TENS Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain in People With CLBP

NCT ID: NCT04090814

Last Updated: 2021-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2019-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this cross-over study 25 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were tested for pain relief in 2 conditions: while using the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) application and without using it. Primary outcome: Movement-Evoked Pain (MEP). This was measured using the Back Performance Scale (BPS) and a 5-minute walk test (5MWT). Participants performed 5 functional tasks and were asked to rate their pain before, during, and after each movement on a numeric rating score scale. The same principle will be used for the 5MWT: for each walking-minute, 3 pain measurements will be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low-back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Movement-Evoked Pain during TENS treatment

Participants performed several physical tasks while using the HeatTens device (HV-F311-E). During these tasks, participants needed to rate their pain.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HeatTens (HV-F311-E)

Intervention Type DEVICE

(1) 2\~108 Hertz (modulation program inside); (2) 100 microseconds (pulse duration)

Movement-Evoked Pain

Participants performed several physical tasks during with their pain was assessed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HeatTens (HV-F311-E)

(1) 2\~108 Hertz (modulation program inside); (2) 100 microseconds (pulse duration)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronic nonspecific LBP for at least 3 months' duration: non-specific LBP implies that patients are not allowed to have any evidence of specific spinal pathology (e.g., hernia, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, spinal fracture or malignancy).

Exclusion Criteria

* spinal surgery in the past 6 months
* severe underlying comorbidity (like diagnosed diabetes, cardiovascular problems, etc.),
* pregnant or given birth in the preceding year,
* having initiated a new LBP treatment in the 6 weeks prior to study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lynn Leemans

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lynn Leemans

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dra. Lynn Leemans

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Brussels, Jette, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Srikandarajah S, Gilron I. Systematic review of movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and meta-analyses: a fundamental distinction requiring standardized measurement. Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1734-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21402445 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LLeemans

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.