Perioperative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Operations in Patients With Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function
NCT ID: NCT00881192
Last Updated: 2012-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
IABP could be used preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. However, despite the wide use of the device, the optimal timing and use of IABP in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains controversial. Time of insertion has been showed to affect hospital mortality, ranging from 18.8% to 19.6% for preoperative insertion, from 27.6% to 32.3% for intraoperative insertion, and from 39% to 40.5% for postoperative insertion. Several studies, randomized and non-randomized, have been conducted to address the impact of preoperative use of IABP on the outcome, each study including a relative small number of patients. In an effort to increase the strength of the results, two meta-analysis have been conducted and published in 2008. The objectives of both were to assess the effect on mortality and morbidity of using IABP preoperatively in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Surprisingly, the meta-analysis from Field and co-workers was conducted on four randomized controlled trials (for a total of 193 patients included) published by the same author from the same institution, making the results not conclusive although favourable toward a beneficial effect of the preoperative use of IABP. Moreover, two of the randomized trials conducted by Christenson and co-workers and included in the above mentioned meta-analysis, were excluded from the meta-analysis from Dyub and co-workers because considered duplicates. Unfortunately, one study by Christenson and co-workers and included in the meta-analysis from Dyub was conducted on off-pump surgery, introducing another bias in the criteria of eligibility.
At present it is unclear whether the preoperative use of IABP in high-risk coronary patients scheduled for CABG operations leads to a better outcome. The experimental hypothesis of the present randomized, controlled trial (RCT) is that the placement of IABP immediately before beginning the surgical procedure induces a reduction of major morbidity after the operation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Prophylactic Use of a Preoperative IABP in High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
NCT03857906
Prophylactic IABP in High-risk Patients Undergoing CABG
NCT01950130
ACTIONS - Aortic Counterpulsation to Improve Outcomes in Noncardiac Surgery
NCT01253356
Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
NCT02143544
CABG Combined Pedicled Omentum Wrapped Autologous Atrial Tissue Patch Cardiomyoplasty for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00972114
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be randomly allocated to either a control group or a treatment group. Patients in the control group will not receive an IABP preoperatively, and patients in the treatment arm will receive an IABP positioned immediately after the induction of anesthesia and before beginning surgery.
Randomization will be performed the day before the operation. Primary endpoint: reduction of major morbidity rate (defined as either prolonged (\> 48 hours) mechanical ventilation, acute renal failure, mediastinitis, surgical revision, stroke).
Secondary endpoint: reduction in inotropic drug use, shortening of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Interim analyses and stopping rules: interim analyses will be done at half (80 patients)and 2/3 (106 patients) of recruitment. The trial could be prematurely stopped in case of a difference in the primary endpoint reaching a P value of 0.005 at the first analysis, and 0.01 at the second.A specific stopping rule is settled for operative mortality (30 days) at 0.01 at the first interim analysis and 0.05 at the second interim analysis. Given the invasive nature and the costs of the intervention, a stopping rule for futility was settled in case of a lack of difference for the primary outcome. This was settled at a relative risk for the primary outcome not including the hypothesized value of 0.5 within 99% CI at the first interim analysis and 95% CI at the second.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
No preoperative IABP; if needed, postoperative IABP placement
No interventions assigned to this group
IABP
Preoperative IABP placement
IABP
preoperative IABP placement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IABP
preoperative IABP placement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years
* Ejection fraction \< 0.35
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency operation
* Contra-indication to IABP placement
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco Ranucci
Anesthesia and Reanimation Clinical Research Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Policlinico S.Donato
San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese (Milan), , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dyub AM, Whitlock RP, Abouzahr LL, Cina CS. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00499.x.
Christenson JT, Licker M, Kalangos A. The role of intra-aortic counterpulsation in high-risk OPCAB surgery: a prospective randomized study. J Card Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;18(4):286-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8191.2003.02030.x.
Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Biondi A, de Vincentiis C, Ballotta A, Varrica A, Frigiola A, Menicanti L; Surgical and Clinical Outcome Research (SCORE) Group. A randomized controlled trial of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in coronary patients with poor left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery*. Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2476-83. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182978dfc.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IABPCABG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.