Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) With Desipramine
NCT ID: NCT00880594
Last Updated: 2026-01-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2014-11-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Imaging and Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT00065754
Phenotyping IBS: Perceptions and Modulations of Visceral Sensations
NCT02693730
Effect of Serotonergic Stimulation on the Gut-brain Axis
NCT03920410
Treatment of Functional Bowel Disorders
NCT00006157
Validation of Surrogate Measures in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
NCT00693732
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypotheses and Aims The overarching hypothesis of this proposal is that abnormal homeostatic afferent processing network (HAPN) responses to visceral stimulation have mechanistic relevance to a subset of patients with IBS. It is further hypothesized that abnormalities HAPN responses to afferent pain signals in IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) result in: (1) more generalized pain experiences (both visceral and somatic), and (2) more severe IBS and somatic pain symptom experiences.
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), our preliminary findings have revealed abnormal activation of HAPN brain regions following visceral stimulation in IBS subjects compared to healthy controls. Our pilot data also demonstrated a distinct pattern of abnormal HAPN activations in response to visceral stimulation in IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) compared to those without somatization (IBS-S-). These findings suggest that clinical differences between IBS-S+ and IBS-S- subjects may result from aberrant HAPN responses to visceral sensory input. The purpose of this proposal is to further investigate the mechanistic importance of the brain's homeostatic afferent processing network in the presence of overlapping somatization and mood disorders to symptom experiences in IBS.
This goal will be realized through the pursuit of the following Specific Aims:
Specific Aim 1. To validate homeostatic afferent processing network (HAPN) activation patterns with noxious visceral stimulation in IBS subjects, and determine their relationship to visceral pain symptom experiences.
Hypothesis 1: IBS subjects collectively will demonstrate a pattern of abnormal HAPN activation in response to noxious visceral stimulation Hypothesis 1b: Abnormal HAPN brain activations overall will correlate with greater subjective pain ratings of noxious visceral stimulation in IBS subjects Specific Aim 2. To evaluate the influence of somatization on HAPN activations with noxious visceral and somatic stimulation in IBS subjects, and determine their relationship to pain symptom experiences.
Hypothesis 2: IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) will demonstrate abnormal HAPN activation in response to both noxious visceral and somatic stimuli, when compared to IBS subjects with no somatization (IBS-S-).
Specific Aim 3: To determine the influence of despiramine on abnormal HAPN brain activations in IBS-S+ and IBS-S- subjects.
Hypothesis 3: Desipramine will normalize HAPN activations in both IBS-S+ and IBS-S-, with greater effects in the IBS-S+ cohort.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IBS-High somatization
Participants meeting Rome III criteria for IBS and with high somatization (PHQ≥10)
Desipramine
Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.
IBS-Low somatization
Participants meeting Rome III criteria for IBS and with high somatization (PHQ≤5)
Desipramine
Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Desipramine
Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To be eligible, subjects will have to be between 18 and 90 years of age (inclusive) and qualify for a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome according to the criteria set forth in the Rome III criteria for the Diagnosis of Functional GI Disorders.
* IBS patients will then be assessed in terms of comorbid somatization as determined using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15).
* For this particular study, only subjects with high somatization (PHQ ≥ 10 or low somatization (PHQ ≤5) will be considered for enrollment.
* Verification of somatization status will be performed using a formal structured interview process (Diagnostic Interview Schedule, DIS).
* Persons are eligible to participate without regard to race or ethnicity.
* Given sex differences in cerebral responses to noxious stimuli and the greater prevalence of IBS in women, only female participants will be sought in this study.
* Also, in view brain hemispheric differences between left- and right-hand dominant individuals and the greater prevalence of right-handedness, all participants must be right-handed
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychiatric/cognitive exclusions include any of the following: active suicidal or homicidal ideation or a history of attempted suicide, current excessive alcohol use or other substance abuse disorders, active major depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar depression or any psychotic disorder, unwillingness to be randomized or provide informed consent, inability to communicate with staff or significant cognitive impairment.
* Medical and other exclusions include any of the following: renal or hepatic disease or impairment, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cardiac arrythmia, cerebrovascular disease, or breastfeeding, pregnant, or imminent intention of pregnancy, history of seizures or primary neurological disorder, head trauma, brain damage, hyper- or hypothyroidism, history or abdominal surgery (other than cholecystectomy/appendectomy), or known structural GI disorder (Crohn's disease, etc.), contraindication to MRI (metallic implant, pacemaker), or rectal balloon distention (e.g., proctitis/colitis).
* Exclusions related to medications:
1. Analgesics (narcotics, NSAIDs; acetaminophen OK)
2. Muscle relaxants
3. Psychoactive agents (antidepressants, antipsychotics)
4. Other medications (phenytoin; amphetamines, prescription weight-loss drugs, or benzodiazepines)
5. Thyroid medication
6. Anticholinergic medications or other IBS medications (hyoscyamine, dicyclomine)
7. Cytochrome p450 substrates
8. Participation in any clinical trial using any other drug.
18 Years
90 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gregory S. Sayuk, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-0013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.