Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) With Desipramine

NCT ID: NCT00880594

Last Updated: 2026-01-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-11-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may experience abdominal pain as a result of pain signals in the bowel and how these signals are processed in the brain. Studies using brain imaging (pictures) have shown that IBS patients with more pain diagnoses (i.e. fibromyalgia, migraines, etc.) have greater activity in the regions of the brain responsible for the emotional and thought processing of pain signals. This could possibly make bowel sensations and bowel difficulties feel abnormal or more noticeable, in turn causing more severe IBS symptoms. The purpose of this protocol is to explore the role of pain diagnoses and their affect on brain activity in IBS patients. The investigators will also examine the use of a medication, desipramine, which is known to affect these brain regions, in IBS patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common abdominal pain disorder diagnosed by symptom-based criteria (Rome III). Since there is no objective measure available to establish a formal diagnosis, IBS likely encompasses a biologically heterogeneous group of patients with distinct pathophysiology. To date, studies evaluating the mechanistic basis of IBS largely have focused on bowel-specific factors. More recently, differences in brain activation patterns in response to painful visceral stimuli (rectal balloon distention) have been identified in IBS subjects compared to healthy controls. These differences often are observed within the homeostatic afferent processing network (HAPN), regions of the brain responsible for the descending inhibition of pain signals, as well as the affective and emotional response to pain. However, IBS brain activation patterns are inconsistent across IBS studies. One likely explanation for this variation in brain activations is the role of psychiatric co-morbidity often present in IBS. No study to-date has considered whether unique patterns of cerebral activation during visceral stimulation exist among subgroups of IBS patients. In our current work, we are exploring the role of multiple co-morbid unexplained pain syndromes, hereafter referred to as 'somatization', and its relevance to IBS subjects' brain responses to pain. We anticipate that IBS patients with somatization (IBS-S+) have aberrant descending inhibitory neurocircuitry, facilitating more intense pain experiences across a spectrum of ascending pain signals (both visceral and somatic). Somatization can be readily detected using standardized instruments and medical histories, and when present in IBS subjects clinically portends more severe bowel symptoms, and poorer responses to proven bowel-specific IBS therapies. Greater insight into the relevance of somatization and mood symptoms to HAPN brain networks thus is not only critical to our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBS, but also may reveal additional clinical targets for the management of these disorders.

Hypotheses and Aims The overarching hypothesis of this proposal is that abnormal homeostatic afferent processing network (HAPN) responses to visceral stimulation have mechanistic relevance to a subset of patients with IBS. It is further hypothesized that abnormalities HAPN responses to afferent pain signals in IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) result in: (1) more generalized pain experiences (both visceral and somatic), and (2) more severe IBS and somatic pain symptom experiences.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), our preliminary findings have revealed abnormal activation of HAPN brain regions following visceral stimulation in IBS subjects compared to healthy controls. Our pilot data also demonstrated a distinct pattern of abnormal HAPN activations in response to visceral stimulation in IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) compared to those without somatization (IBS-S-). These findings suggest that clinical differences between IBS-S+ and IBS-S- subjects may result from aberrant HAPN responses to visceral sensory input. The purpose of this proposal is to further investigate the mechanistic importance of the brain's homeostatic afferent processing network in the presence of overlapping somatization and mood disorders to symptom experiences in IBS.

This goal will be realized through the pursuit of the following Specific Aims:

Specific Aim 1. To validate homeostatic afferent processing network (HAPN) activation patterns with noxious visceral stimulation in IBS subjects, and determine their relationship to visceral pain symptom experiences.

Hypothesis 1: IBS subjects collectively will demonstrate a pattern of abnormal HAPN activation in response to noxious visceral stimulation Hypothesis 1b: Abnormal HAPN brain activations overall will correlate with greater subjective pain ratings of noxious visceral stimulation in IBS subjects Specific Aim 2. To evaluate the influence of somatization on HAPN activations with noxious visceral and somatic stimulation in IBS subjects, and determine their relationship to pain symptom experiences.

Hypothesis 2: IBS subjects with comorbid somatization (IBS-S+) will demonstrate abnormal HAPN activation in response to both noxious visceral and somatic stimuli, when compared to IBS subjects with no somatization (IBS-S-).

Specific Aim 3: To determine the influence of despiramine on abnormal HAPN brain activations in IBS-S+ and IBS-S- subjects.

Hypothesis 3: Desipramine will normalize HAPN activations in both IBS-S+ and IBS-S-, with greater effects in the IBS-S+ cohort.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IBS-High somatization

Participants meeting Rome III criteria for IBS and with high somatization (PHQ≥10)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Desipramine

Intervention Type DRUG

Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.

IBS-Low somatization

Participants meeting Rome III criteria for IBS and with high somatization (PHQ≤5)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Desipramine

Intervention Type DRUG

Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Desipramine

Desipramine 25 mg/day administered in the evening. Dosing may be increased dependent upon side-effects and clinical response to a maximum of 100 mg/day. Absent significant side-effects, all patients are increased at the one week visit to 50 mg/day at bedtime if they have not achieved a report of "Adequate relief". Thereafter, up to week 4, the daily desipramine dose may be increased weekly by 25 mg up to the 100 mg/d maximum.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* IBS subjects with- and without comorbid somatization features will be recruited from the sources highlighted above.
* To be eligible, subjects will have to be between 18 and 90 years of age (inclusive) and qualify for a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome according to the criteria set forth in the Rome III criteria for the Diagnosis of Functional GI Disorders.
* IBS patients will then be assessed in terms of comorbid somatization as determined using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15).
* For this particular study, only subjects with high somatization (PHQ ≥ 10 or low somatization (PHQ ≤5) will be considered for enrollment.
* Verification of somatization status will be performed using a formal structured interview process (Diagnostic Interview Schedule, DIS).
* Persons are eligible to participate without regard to race or ethnicity.
* Given sex differences in cerebral responses to noxious stimuli and the greater prevalence of IBS in women, only female participants will be sought in this study.
* Also, in view brain hemispheric differences between left- and right-hand dominant individuals and the greater prevalence of right-handedness, all participants must be right-handed

Exclusion Criteria

* Persons are excluded from participation for having various psychiatric, medical, and other characteristics.
* Psychiatric/cognitive exclusions include any of the following: active suicidal or homicidal ideation or a history of attempted suicide, current excessive alcohol use or other substance abuse disorders, active major depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar depression or any psychotic disorder, unwillingness to be randomized or provide informed consent, inability to communicate with staff or significant cognitive impairment.
* Medical and other exclusions include any of the following: renal or hepatic disease or impairment, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cardiac arrythmia, cerebrovascular disease, or breastfeeding, pregnant, or imminent intention of pregnancy, history of seizures or primary neurological disorder, head trauma, brain damage, hyper- or hypothyroidism, history or abdominal surgery (other than cholecystectomy/appendectomy), or known structural GI disorder (Crohn's disease, etc.), contraindication to MRI (metallic implant, pacemaker), or rectal balloon distention (e.g., proctitis/colitis).
* Exclusions related to medications:

1. Analgesics (narcotics, NSAIDs; acetaminophen OK)
2. Muscle relaxants
3. Psychoactive agents (antidepressants, antipsychotics)
4. Other medications (phenytoin; amphetamines, prescription weight-loss drugs, or benzodiazepines)
5. Thyroid medication
6. Anticholinergic medications or other IBS medications (hyoscyamine, dicyclomine)
7. Cytochrome p450 substrates
8. Participation in any clinical trial using any other drug.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gregory S. Sayuk, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-0013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Signs of Parkinsons Disease in IBS
NCT05573542 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION