Effect of Priming During Induction and Consolidations in Younger Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT ID: NCT00880243
Last Updated: 2009-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
473 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-03-31
2006-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To compare priming with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) during induction and consolidation courses versus no priming.
2. To compare as consolidation timed sequential chemotherapy versus four courses of high dose cytarabine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transfusion in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT02899767
Phase III rhu_GM-CSF + 3 Induction Regimens in Adults With Acute Non-Lymphocytic Leukemia
NCT04446052
Transfusion Dependency at Diagnosis and Transfusion Intensity During Initial Chemotherapy Are Associated With Poorer Outcomes in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
NCT02844257
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without G-CSF in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00002719
Early Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Allo-HSCT for Patients With AML
NCT03597321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who achieve CR after induction chemotherapy or salvage therapy are randomly assigned to consolidation courses consisting of either a timed sequential chemotherapy similar to that of the ALFA-9000 trial (P2 arm) or the CALGB postremission chemotherapy (P1 arm), which includes 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine, followed by 4 additional maintenance courses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EMA+GM-CSF
* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3,
* AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3,
* Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9
* AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10.
* GM-CSF (LeucomaxR): 5 µg/kg/jour IV over 6 hours from day 1 to day 10.
GM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses.
Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
EMA without GM-CSF
* Daunorubicine (CérubidineR) : 80 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 1 to day 3,
* AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/jour IV from day 1 to day 3,
* Mitoxantrone (NovantroneR) : 12 mg/m2/jour IV over 30 min from day 8 to 9
* AraC (AracytineR) : 500 mg/m2/12h IV over 3 hours from day 8 to day10.
GM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses.
Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
HD AraC+ GM-CSF
* AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5
* GM-CSF :5 µg/kg/d IV (6 hours) from day1 to day 5
GM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses.
Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
HD-AraC without GM-CSF
\- AraC (Aracytine) : 3 g/m2/12h IV (3 hours) on days 1, 3 , 5
GM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses.
Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GM-CSF
Randomization 1: GM-CSF (5micogram/Kg/d) versus no GM-CSF during induction chemotherapy and all consolidation courses.
Randomiization 2: Consolidation high dose AraC versus consolidation EMA
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Serum creatinine \< 2N; AST and ALT \< 2.5N; total bilirubin \< 2N (unless related to the underlying disease).
* ECOG performance status 0 to 2.
* Women of child-bearing must use acceptable contraceptive methods, and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior the beginning treatment on this trial.
* Must be able and willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient presenting any diagnosis of uncontrolled or metastatic tumor.
* Patients with uncontrolled severe infection,
15 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Acute Leukemia French Association
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Service Hematologie, LYON, France
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
XAVIER THOMAS, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospices Civils de Lyon
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thomas X, Raffoux E, Botton Sd, Pautas C, Arnaud P, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Corront B, Gardin C, Le QH, Quesnel B, Cordonnier C, Bourhis JH, Elhamri M, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Effect of priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Group. Leukemia. 2007 Mar;21(3):453-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404521. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
Thomas X, Elhamri M, Raffoux E, Renneville A, Pautas C, de Botton S, de Revel T, Reman O, Terre C, Gardin C, Chelghoum Y, Boissel N, Quesnel B, Hicheri Y, Bourhis JH, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Michallet M, Castaigne S, Dombret H. Comparison of high-dose cytarabine and timed-sequential chemotherapy as consolidation for younger adults with AML in first remission: the ALFA-9802 study. Blood. 2011 Aug 18;118(7):1754-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-349258. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
Boissel N, Nibourel O, Renneville A, Gardin C, Reman O, Contentin N, Bordessoule D, Pautas C, de Revel T, Quesnel B, Huchette P, Philippe N, Geffroy S, Terre C, Thomas X, Castaigne S, Dombret H, Preudhomme C. Prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme isoforms 1 and 2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the Acute Leukemia French Association group. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 10;28(23):3717-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.2285. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALFA 9802
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.