Trial for Patients Not Qualifying for TT4 and TT5 Protocols Because of Prior Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00871013

Last Updated: 2025-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There have been four previous Total Therapy (TT1 through IIIB) studies for multiple myeloma at the MIRT from 1989 to present. Results have shown that participants treated on these studies had better outcomes (meaning they have lived longer and had better responses to treatment) when compared to individuals treated with standard chemotherapy.

Past studies conducted at the MIRT have shown that participants presenting to MIRT who have already received treatment for myeloma tend to have shorter remissions (disappearance of signs and symptoms of myeloma) and do not survive as long as participants who come to MIRT with untreated myeloma. Researchers at MIRT think that one reason for this is may be that the myeloma cells re-grow in the time when participants are not receiving treatment because they are recovering from high-dose chemotherapy. In this study, participants will receive several chemotherapy drugs previously shown to be effective in myeloma, but in lower doses and in shorter cycles. It is hoped that by giving the drugs in this way, myeloma cells will not have time to re-grow between cycles, therefore resulting in longer remissions. This study is being done in an attempt to improve the remission rate and the survival time for participants with high-risk myeloma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* To find out if giving multi-agent chemotherapy in lower and more frequent doses to make the timely delivery of chemotherapy cycles possible, will result in better myeloma responses
* To find out if changing the way the drugs are given during the transplant phase will also result in fewer side effects, while still being effective
* To find out if giving treatment between transplants (called "inter-therapy") will prevent the myeloma from re-growing between transplants
* To find out if long-term maintenance therapy will result in longer remissions
* To find out what the effects (good and bad) of this overall treatment will be
* To learn more about the biology and genetics of multiple myeloma by performing imaging tests and collecting blood, bone marrow aspirate and biopsies, and biopsies of lesions seen on MRI or PET scans. Bone marrow aspirates and biopsies are tissue sample collected from the bone cavity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MEL-VTD-PACE

Melphalan, Velcade, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone, CisPlatin, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Melphalan

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein, Day 3

First Inter-Therapy Treatment Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Days 1 and 4

Second Inter-Therapy Treatment Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Days 1 and 4

Second Transplant Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Day -5 and Day -2

Year 1 Maintenance Velcade (bortezomib) By vein Days 1, 8, 15, 22(weekly) Every 28 days

Years 2 \& 3 Maintenance Velcade (bortezomib) By vein Days 1, 8, 15, 22(weekly) Every 56 days

Velcade

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein, Days 1, 5, 8, 11

Thalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by mouth at bedtime, Days 5-8

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by mouth, once per day Days 5-8

Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein, Days 5-8 continuous infusion

Adriamycin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein, days 5-8 continuous infusion

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein days 5-8 continuous infusion

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given by vein days 5-8 continuous infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Melphalan

Given by vein, Day 3

First Inter-Therapy Treatment Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Days 1 and 4

Second Inter-Therapy Treatment Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Days 1 and 4

Second Transplant Bortezomib (Velcade) By vein Day -5 and Day -2

Year 1 Maintenance Velcade (bortezomib) By vein Days 1, 8, 15, 22(weekly) Every 28 days

Years 2 \& 3 Maintenance Velcade (bortezomib) By vein Days 1, 8, 15, 22(weekly) Every 56 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Velcade

Given by vein, Days 1, 5, 8, 11

Intervention Type DRUG

Thalidomide

Given by mouth at bedtime, Days 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

Given by mouth, once per day Days 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin

Given by vein, Days 5-8 continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Adriamycin

Given by vein, days 5-8 continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

Given by vein days 5-8 continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

Given by vein days 5-8 continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Alkeran Bortezomib, PS-341 Thalomid Decadron Platinol, CDDP Doxorubicin Cytoxan Vepesid, VP-16

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), with at least one prior line of chemotherapy or newly diagnosed without any prior therapy.
* Zebroid ≤ 2, unless solely due to symptoms of MM-related bone disease (Appendix 4).
* Patients must be at least 18 years of age and not older than 75 years of age at the time of registration.
* Patient must not have had a prior auto- or allotransplant.
* Patient must have signed an IRB-approved informed consent and understand the investigational nature of the study.
* Patients must have adequate pulmonary function studies ≥ 50% of predicted on mechanical aspects (FEV1, FVC, etc) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) ≥ 50% of predicted, within 60 days prior to enrollment. Patients unable to complete pulmonary function tests because of myeloma-related chest pain, must have a high resolution CT scan of the chest and must also have acceptable arterial blood gases defined as P02 greater than 70.
* Ejection fraction by ECHO or MUGA must be ≥ 40% and must be performed within 60 days prior to enrollment, unless the patient has received chemotherapy within that period of time (dexamethasone and thalidomide excluded), in which case the LVEF must be repeated.
* Patients must not have prior malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has not received treatment for one year prior to enrollment. Other cancers will only be acceptable if the patient's life expectancy exceeds five years.
* Patients must be able to receive full doses of Mel-VRD-PACE, in the opinion of the treating investigator, with the exception that patients with creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min will receive only 50% of the cisplatin dose.

Exclusion Criteria

* Fever or active infection requiring intravenous antibiotic, defined as fever or antibiotics within 72 hours from registration.
* Severe renal dysfunction, defined as a creatinine \> 3mg/dl or a creatinine clearance of \< 30ml/min.
* Significant neurotoxicity, defined as grade ≥ 3 neurotoxicity per NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (See Appendix).
* Platelet count \< 30,000/mm3, and ANC \< 1,000/μl
* POEMS Syndrome: (Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal gammopathy, and Skin changes
* Clinically significant hepatic dysfunction as noted by direct bilirubin or AST \>3 times the upper normal limit or clinically significant concurrent hepatitis.
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or Class IV heart failure (Appendix 4).
* Recent (≤ 6 months) myocardial infarction, unstable angina, difficult to control congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, or difficult to control cardiac arrhythmias are ineligible.
* Patients with a history of treatment for clinically significant ventricular cardiac arrhythmias.
* Poorly-controlled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or other serious medical illness or psychiatric illness that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol.
* Prior cumulative total of Adriamycin exposure \>450 mg/m2.
* Prior exposure to thalidomide which resulted in severe toxicity requiring drug discontinuation.
* Prior exposure to Revlimid which resulted in severe toxicity requiring drug discontinuation
* Hypersensitivity to boron, or Mannitol. Prior exposure to bortezomib which resulted in severe toxicity requiring drug discontinuation.
* Pregnant or nursing women may not participate. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy documented within one week of registration. Women/men of reproductive potential may not participate unless they have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maurizio Zangari, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arkansas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Davies FE, Rosenthal A, Rasche L, Petty NM, McDonald JE, Ntambi JA, Steward DM, Panozzo SB, van Rhee F, Zangari M, Schinke CD, Thanendrarajan S, Walker B, Weinhold N, Barlogie B, Hoering A, Morgan GJ. Treatment to suppression of focal lesions on positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a therapeutic goal in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):1047-1053. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.177139. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29567784 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

108053

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ATRA and Carfilzomib in Plasma Cell Myeloma Patients
NCT06536413 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2