UARK 2008-02 A Trial for High-risk Myeloma Evaluating Accelerating and Sustaining Complete Remission

NCT ID: NCT00869232

Last Updated: 2025-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2027-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There have been four previous Total Therapy (TT1 through IIIB) studies for multiple myeloma at the MIRT from 1989 to present. Results have shown that participants treated on these studies had better outcomes (meaning they have lived longer and had better responses to treatment) when compared to individuals treated with standard chemotherapy.

Past studies conducted at the MIRT and at other institutions have shown that participants with high-risk features by gene array studies tend to have shorter remissions (disappearance of signs and symptoms of myeloma) and do not survive as long as participants with low-risk myeloma. Researchers at MIRT think that one reason for this is that the myeloma cells re-grow in the time when participants are not receiving treatment because they are recovering from high-dose chemotherapy. In this study, participants will receive several chemotherapy drugs previously shown to be effective in myeloma, but in lower doses and in shorter cycles. It is hoped that by giving the drugs in this way, myeloma cells will not have time to re-grow between cycles, therefore resulting in longer remissions. This study is being done in an attempt to improve the remission rate and the survival time for participants with high-risk myeloma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* To find out if giving multi-agent chemotherapy in lower and more frequent doses to make the timely delivery of chemotherapy cycles possible, will result in better treatment outcomes
* To find out if changing the way the drugs are given during the transplant phase will also result in fewer side effects, while still being effective
* To find out if giving treatment between transplants (called "inter-transplant therapy") will prevent the myeloma from re-growing between transplants
* To find out if long-term maintenance therapy will result in longer remissions
* To find out what the effects (good and bad) of this overall treatment will be
* To learn more about the biology and genetics of multiple myeloma by performing imaging tests and collecting blood, bone marrow aspirate and biopsies, and biopsies of lesions seen on MRI or PET scans for research

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MEL--VTD-PACE

Melphalan, Velcade, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone, Cisplatin, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide and Etoposide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Velcade

Intervention Type DRUG

1.0mg/m2 days 1, 5, 8, \& 11

Melphalan

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg/m2 day 3

Thalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

200 mg days 5-8

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg day 5-8

Cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg/m2 day 5-8

Adriamycin

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg/m2 day 5-8

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

400 mg/m2 day 5-8

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg/m2 day 5-8

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Velcade

1.0mg/m2 days 1, 5, 8, \& 11

Intervention Type DRUG

Melphalan

10 mg/m2 day 3

Intervention Type DRUG

Thalidomide

200 mg days 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

40 mg day 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Cisplatin

10 mg/m2 day 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Adriamycin

10 mg/m2 day 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

400 mg/m2 day 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

40 mg/m2 day 5-8

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PS-341 Alkeran Thalomid Decadron Platinol Doxorubicin Cytoxan Vp-16, Vepesid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must have newly diagnosed active MM requiring treatment. Patients with previous history of smoldering myeloma will be eligible if there is evidence of progressive disease requiring chemotherapy.
* Patients must be either untreated o have not had more than one cycle of systemic MM therapy, excluding bisphosphonates and localized radiation.
* Patients must have high-risk disease, as defined by any one of the following:
* GEP risk score of \> or = 0.66 or
* LDH \> or = 360 U/L Rule out hemolysis, infection an contact PI for clarification
* Zubrod \< or = 2, unless solely due to symptoms of MM-related bone disease.
* Patients must have a platelet count of \> or = 50,000/uL, unless lower levels are explained by extensive bone marrow plasmacytosis.
* Patients must be at least 18 years of age and not older than 75 years of age at the time of registration.
* Participants must have preserved renal function as defined by a serum creatinine level of \< 3 mg/dL.
* Participants must have an ejection fraction by ECHO or MUGA scan \> or = 45%
* Patients must have adequate pulmonary function studies \> or = 50% of predicted on mechanical aspects (FEV squared, FVC, etc) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) \> or = 50% of predicted. If the patient is unable to complete pulmonary function tests due to MM related pain or condition, exception may be granted if the principle investigator documents that the patient is a candidate for high dose therapy.
* Patients must have signed an IRB-approved informed consent indicating their understanding of the proposed treatment and understanding that the protocol has been approved by the IRB.

Exclusion Criteria

* Does not have high-risk disease
* Poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or other serious medical illness or psychiatric illness that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol.
* Patients must not have prior malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has not received treatment for one year prior to enrollment. Other cancers will only be acceptable if the patient's life expectancy exceeds five years.
* Pregnant or nursing women may not participate. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy documented within one week of registration. Subjects of reproductive potential may not participate unless they have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frits van Rhee, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UAMS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pawlyn C. High-risk myeloma: a challenge to define and to determine the optimal treatment. Lancet Haematol. 2021 Jan;8(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30361-6. Epub 2020 Dec 22. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33357481 (View on PubMed)

Davies FE, Rosenthal A, Rasche L, Petty NM, McDonald JE, Ntambi JA, Steward DM, Panozzo SB, van Rhee F, Zangari M, Schinke CD, Thanendrarajan S, Walker B, Weinhold N, Barlogie B, Hoering A, Morgan GJ. Treatment to suppression of focal lesions on positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a therapeutic goal in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):1047-1053. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.177139. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29567784 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

106952

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.