Clinical Trial Comparing Volar, Dorsal, and Custom Thermoplastic Splinting in the Treatment of Acute Mallet Finger

NCT ID: NCT00868686

Last Updated: 2009-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In most cases of acute mallet finger, or avulsion of the extensor digitorum communis terminal tendon from the distal phalanx, splinting is the treatment strategy employed. The type of splint used to treat these injuries continues to be controversial. Custom splints have recently been advocated though no strong comparative evidence is available.

The primary objective of this investigation was to show superiority of the custom thermoplastic splint over both the dorsal and volar non-custom splints. The null hypothesis was that a radiographic lag difference greater than 5 degrees would not be observed between groups. The primary outcome measure is the residual extensor lag difference (compared to the contralateral equivalent digit) at 12 weeks post-splinting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In most cases of acute mallet finger, or avulsion of the extensor digitorum communis terminal tendon from the distal phalanx, splinting is the treatment strategy employed. These are considered Doyle I injuries- closed injuries with or without a small (\<20%) avulsion fragment. Absolute and relative indications for surgical intervention include an open injury, or a bony mallet involving greater than 20% of the articular surface of the distal phalanx with volar subluxation of the distal phalanx relative to the proximal phalanx. The type of splint used to treat Doyle I mallet injuries continues to be controversial. Custom splints have recently been advocated though no strong comparative evidence is available.

Objectives. The primary objective of this investigation was to show superiority of the custom thermoplastic splint over both the dorsal and volar non-custom splints. The null hypothesis was that a radiographic lag difference greater than 5 degrees would not be observed between groups. The primary outcome measure is the residual extensor lag difference (compared to the contralateral equivalent digit) at 12 weeks post-splinting. Week-12 was chosen as a compromise between minimizing drop-out and the most distant timepoint reasonably obtainable.

A novel outcome lag measurement was developed for this study, using the contralateral normal digit as an internal control for establishing residual extensor lag. The residual extensor lag difference was calculated with a single radiograph obtained with the beam directed laterally at the affected digit and the contralateral equivalent digit (Figure 2). For example, if the injured mallet finger was the right index finger, a single lateral radiograph of the right and left index fingers on the same film was obtained. The patient was instructed to maximally extend the both digits. This allowed for accurate determination of extensor lag and comparison with the unaffected side . Adequacy of the lateral view was assessed by considering the superimposition of the phalangeal condyles of the affected digit. If they were not not superimposed, the radiograph was repeated.

A pilot study was performed to establish the most reliable technique for measuring residual lag radiographically. Three measurement techniques were trialled by individuals with three levels of training: resident, fellow, and consultant staff. A clearly defined technique was employed using digital images only (Inteleviewer, Intelerad, Montreal, Canada). The radiograph was enlarged on the viewing monitor so that the middle and distal phalanges maximally filled the screen. The techniques used bisecting lines for the middle and distal phalanges referencing either the volar cortex, dorsal cortex, or longitudinal axis of the phalanges (Figure 3). Twenty-six lateral finger radiographs were blinded and assessed, and then repeat measurements were obtained three weeks later. Inter-item correlation matrices and intraobserver Pearson's correlations showed extremely high correlation values ranging from 0.993 to 0.999 for the longitudinal axis technique. This pilot study established the longitudinal axis technique as the most reliable in measuring residual radiographic lag.

Several secondary objectives were investigated. These included correlations between residual lag and other factors, including patient age, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores (MHQ) and the development of complications; incidence of complications in each splinting group; comparing radiographic to clinical extensor lag differences; and evaluating the course of residual lag after splinting has been discontinued. Exploratory analyses were performed as hypothesis generators only, including sub-group analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mallet Finger

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Volar aluminum splint

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Volar aluminum splint

Intervention Type DEVICE

Alumafoam strip with padding removed, placed on the VOLAR aspect of the digit spanning the middle and distal phalanges only.

Dorsal aluminum splint

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dorsal aluminum splint

Intervention Type DEVICE

Alumafoam strip with padding removed, placed on the DORSAL aspect of the digit spanning the middle and distal phalanges only.

Custom thermoplastic

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Custom thermoplastic

Intervention Type DEVICE

Customized thermoplastic splint with circumferential contact proximal to the joint and volar contact distal to the joint. This is a similar design to the original Stack splint, except that it is custom molded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Volar aluminum splint

Alumafoam strip with padding removed, placed on the VOLAR aspect of the digit spanning the middle and distal phalanges only.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dorsal aluminum splint

Alumafoam strip with padding removed, placed on the DORSAL aspect of the digit spanning the middle and distal phalanges only.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Custom thermoplastic

Customized thermoplastic splint with circumferential contact proximal to the joint and volar contact distal to the joint. This is a similar design to the original Stack splint, except that it is custom molded.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients identified as having an acute mallet finger (defined as mallet injuries all digits excluding the thumb presenting less than 28 days since injury)

Exclusion Criteria

* open injury
* an intra-articular fragment of the distal phalanx involved greater than one third of articular surface
* DIP joint subluxation
* pre-existing arthritis of the DIP joint was present
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Paul's Hospital, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

St Paul's Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey M Pike, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Paul's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H05-50193

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.