Comparison of Airtraq Versus MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach
NCT ID: NCT00847184
Last Updated: 2009-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2009-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Indirect Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00910156
Airtraq Versus Fiberoptic for Awake Tracheal Intubation
NCT03539185
Comparison Airway Devices in Nasotracheal Intubation in Manikin
NCT01311284
Which Nostril Should be Used for Nasotracheal Intubation With Airtraq NT®: the Right or Left? A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03226002
A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident
NCT04386356
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1. Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
2. MacIntosh
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
Intubation
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intubation
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Harald Groeben, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof. Dr. Harald Groeben
Essen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006 May;61(5):469-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04547.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Airtraqnasal2009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.