Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
222 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives: The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources.
Methods: A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA LTC facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to nutritional care processes and resident outcomes. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the immediate intervention group; while, the delayed intervention group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures.
Status: This project ended 10/1/13. Five published papers resulted from this study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Loss Prevention in Nursing Homes: A Controlled Trial
NCT02567513
Cost Effectiveness of Nutrition Intervention in Long Term Care
NCT02567526
Lowering Caloric Density of the Diet
NCT02674971
Predicting Adherence to a Heart-Healthy Diet in Lean and Obese Individuals
NCT01862796
Eat Well for Life: A Weight Loss Maintenance Study
NCT01849627
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Numerous studies have shown that many long term care (LTC) residents receive inadequate staff assistance with eating, which places them at risk for under-nutrition, dehydration and weight loss. Moreover, improvements in feeding assistance care have been shown to improve residents' daily food and fluid consumption and weight loss outcomes. However, these improvements have only been achieved through the use of research staff as opposed to indigenous LTC staff due to staffing resource limitations that exist in most LTC facilities. The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources.
Objectives:
The PI of this proposal has developed standardized assessment, monitoring and staffing needs projection tools that can be used by long-term care (LTC) providers to improve feeding assistance care delivery and unintentional weight loss outcomes. The primary objective of this project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to (1) identify residents in need of feeding assistance, (2) effectively monitor daily care delivery; and, (3) utilize existing, non-nursing staff for some mealtime tasks to improve care.
Methods:
A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA long-term care (LTC) facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to organizational characteristics, including staffing, nutritional care processes and resident outcomes including oral food and fluid intake and weight status. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation purposes (for a total of 4 groups across the 2 sites) based on the proximity of a unit to other units, resident and staff characteristics. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the first site/group; while, the second site/group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures. Research staff trained LTC staff in the implementation of program protocols during a 12-week intervention period. Research staff then monitored LTC staff implementation of the program monthly following intervention to determine the sustainability of the program in the absence of research staff. All staff training and monitoring was repeated for the LTC units in groups three and four. The intent of this program evaluation study was to determine the effectiveness and cost of translating efficacious research protocols into care practice to improve the nutritional status of LTC veterans.
Status: This study is officially complete.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate Intervention Group
Immediate Intervention: Long term care units assigned to the Immediate Intervention group were first to receive the staff training and management intervention to improve nutritional care processes.
Immediate Intervention Group
Unit staff received weekly training and feedback for 12-weeks to improve daily nutritional care processes.
Delayed Intervention Group
Delayed Intervention: Long term care units assigned to the Delayed Intervention group were monitored under usual care conditions to serve as a control for the Immediate Intervention group. Then, these units received the staff training and management intervention at a later date.
Delayed Intervention Group
Research staff monitored this group under usual care conditions, then these units crossed over into intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Immediate Intervention Group
Unit staff received weekly training and feedback for 12-weeks to improve daily nutritional care processes.
Delayed Intervention Group
Research staff monitored this group under usual care conditions, then these units crossed over into intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* free of feeding tube,
* not receiving hospice care,
* not on a planned weight loss diet,
* able to speak English
Exclusion Criteria
* feeding tube
* hospice
* planned weight loss diet
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandra F Simmons, BA MA PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Simmons SF, Durkin DW, Shotwell MS, Erwin S, Schnelle JF. A staff training and management intervention in VA long-term care: impact on feeding assistance care quality. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Jun;3(2):189-99. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0194-3.
Simmons SF, Sims N, Durkin DW, Shotwell MS, Erwin S, Schnelle JF. The quality of feeding assistance care practices for long-term care veterans: implications for quality improvement efforts. J Appl Gerontol. 2013 Sep;32(6):669-86. doi: 10.1177/0733464811433487. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
Durkin DW, Shotwell MS, Simmons SF. The impact of family visitation on feeding assistance quality in nursing homes. J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Aug;33(5):586-602. doi: 10.1177/0733464814522126. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Durkin DW, Umayam SP, Sims N, Cleeton P, Simmons SF. Whom do veteran nursing home residents prefer to talk to about satisfaction with care?: implications for nursing staff. J Gerontol Nurs. 2012 Dec;38(12):38-45. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20121109-01.
Simmons SF, Durkin DW, Rahman AN, Schnelle JF, Beuscher LM. The value of resident choice during daily care: do staff and families differ? J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Sep;33(6):655-71. doi: 10.1177/0733464812454010. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIR 07-250
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.