Total Knee Replacement Study Using Standard Cutting Guide vs Otismed MRI Generated Cutting Guide
NCT ID: NCT00837772
Last Updated: 2016-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial of Mechanical Axis vs Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02527148
A Randomized Prospective Trial of Total Knee Arthroplasty Options Comparing Standard Knee Cutting Guides and MRI Generated Patient Specific Custom Cutting Guides
NCT01072019
Total Knee Arthroplasty Guidance Systems Study
NCT02830997
Visionaireâ„¢ Versus Standard Instrumentation Safety and Efficacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT01084772
Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Retaining and Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Replacements
NCT03088748
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary:
Compare the surgical and clinical outcomes between patients receiving total knee replacement after random assignment to one of two groups:
1. surgical procedure with the standard knee cutting guide and
2. surgical procedure with the Otismed MRI generated cutting guide
Secondary:
Evaluate the cost benefit ratio related to the two different cutting guide uses.
Research Plan: All patients that are referred to orthopedics, are eligible for a total knee replacement for osteoarthritis and meet study criteria will be invited to participate. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the standard or the Otismed group. All patients will have a MRI of the knee. Patients and the research staff conducting measurements will be blinded to the type of cutting guide used for the surgery.
Methods: The study will be a randomized trial with the patient and data collector blinded to type of cutting guide used for the surgical procedure. The study will be conducted at one site and enrollment goal is 100 patients. Data collection will be done preoperatively and at 4 wks, 3 months, 6 months, one year and two year. Established instruments, the (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Womac and Oxford Knee Score, will be used. Measurements will be done to evaluate ROM (Range Of Motion) and assess post-op recovery. Surgical data and hospitalization data will be used for analysis of costs. Statistical analysis will be used for comparison of the two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Usual standard cutting guide for TKA (Total Knee Arthroscopy)
Standard cutting guide for TKA
Use of the usual cutting guide for surgical replacement of a diseased knee
Arm 2
Otismed MRI generated cutting guide for TKA
Otismed MRI generated cutting guide for TKA
Use of the customized MRI generated cutting guide for surgical replacement of a diseased knee
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard cutting guide for TKA
Use of the usual cutting guide for surgical replacement of a diseased knee
Otismed MRI generated cutting guide for TKA
Use of the customized MRI generated cutting guide for surgical replacement of a diseased knee
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Phoenix VA Health Care System
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Harold G. Dossett, MD MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):907-13. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812.
Dossett HG, Arthur JR, Makovicka JL, Mara KC, Bingham JS, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties: Long-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S209-S214. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.065. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dossett01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.