CONFIRM - Comparison of in Office Interrogation Versus Remote Measurements

NCT ID: NCT00832988

Last Updated: 2019-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the automated data collection in the Zephyr device as compared to manual testing results for atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds. The secondary objectives include: to compare the in-clinic time needed to retrieve and document the automated device measurements for all tests to the additional time needed to manually measure sensing, impedance and thresholds for the same patient; to compare the accuracy of the automated device test results to manual testing results; evaluate the percentage of patients who are recommended for ACapTM Confirm utilization.

The Primary Hypotheses are:

1. The values reported from ACapTM Confirm will be within 0.125 V of the value that is obtained manually in clinic.
2. The values reported from VentricularAutoCaptureTM will be within 0.125 V of the value that is obtained manually in clinic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pacemaker patients

Patients who are implanted with a SJM Zephyr™ DR device for a standard pacing indication will be eligible

VentricularAutoCaptureTM & ACapTM Confirm

Intervention Type OTHER

The testing algorithms allow the device to display threshold measurements at time of device interrogation. These will be evaluated against manual testing results.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VentricularAutoCaptureTM & ACapTM Confirm

The testing algorithms allow the device to display threshold measurements at time of device interrogation. These will be evaluated against manual testing results.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zephyr™ pacemaker VentricularAutoCaptureTM ACapTM Confirm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients have been implanted with their device \~ 6 months prior
* Patients must have their device evaluated at the enrolling center.
* Patients must be able to comply with the regular routine follow-up schedule of the enrolling clinic.
* Patients must be able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.
* Patients age 18 or greater.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has a unipolar atrial lead implanted.
* Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant.
* Patients with persistent AF.
* Less than 1 year life expectancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kelowna General Hospital

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

North Shore Heart Group

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

William Osler Health Centre

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Peterborough Regional

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clinique de Cardiologie Desilets

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SJM LV001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.