Evaluation of Laborpro - a New Device for the Assessment of Progress of Labor
NCT ID: NCT00827229
Last Updated: 2009-01-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Determination of Labor Progression Patterns Using Non-invasive, Ultrasound Based, Multiple Parameters
NCT00827125
Determination of Labor Progression Patterns Using Non-invasive, Ultrasound Based+Continuous Vacuum Mode
NCT01042483
Assessment of Pelvis Diameters as a Predictor for the Mode of Delivery ,Using Non-invasive, Ultrasound Based Measurements
NCT01093144
Two Methods of Diagnosing Preterm Labor
NCT01431885
Noninvasive Monitoring of Uterine Activity and Fetal Heart Rate
NCT05782296
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods and Procedures The study population included of women admitted to either Maimonides Medical Center (NY, USA) or Bnai Zion Medical Center (Haifa, Israel) in the active phase of labor, with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation. One hundred and ten (110) subjects were enrolled in the study. Two subjects were excluded from the study as one from Bnai Zion Medical Center had a system malfunction (PC failure) and one subject from Maimonides Medical Center changed her mind and refused to participate in the study. Sixty Seven (67) subjects (62%) were enrolled at Maimonides Medical Center and forty one (41) subjects (38%) were enrolled at Bnai Zion Medical Center. Subject's mean age was 28.2 years (ranging from 15.8 years to 39.5).
Each subject was examined and in cases in which the first exam (according to blinded physician assessment) was at an early labor stage (cervical dilatation \< 3 cm), a second examination interval of at least 2 hours after the first one was recorded. In cases where the first examination was performed at a more advanced labor stages (cervical dilatation \> 3 cm), a second examination interval was recorded at least 1 hour after the first one. Each set of examinations (LaborPro and two independent practitioners) of station, position and cervical dilatation was completed within 15 minutes. The two independent physicians were blinded to each other's results and to the LaborPro results. If labor duration enabled further examination, two to three sets of tests were performed for each subject. During labor, the attending physician, a midwife or nurse conducted manual trans-vaginal digital evaluations (TVDEs) according to standard practice with respect to frequency and method.
During the manual TVDE, the clinician used the LaborPro finger sensor so that simultaneous LaborPro measurements of fetal head station finger tip (HSFT) and cervical dilatation (CDFT) were recorded. A trained ultrasonographer (physician, midwife or technician) also performed an ultrasound examination to yield the LaborPro data for measurements of head position (HP) and the head station (HSUS) with respect to BPD vs. Pelvic Inlet or with respect to fetal scalp tip vs. Pelvic Inlet.
Study Endpoints Primary Endpoint The primary efficacy endpoints of the study are average differences between measurements of Head Station (HS) and Cervical Dilatation (CD) made by the device (LaborPro) and by TVDEs.
Secondary Endpoint The secondary efficacy endpoint is the degree of agreement between the Fetal Head Position (HP) measured by LaborPro versus the one measured by TVDE.
In summary, the labor parameters as measured by LaborPro compared to the gold-standard physicians' assessment result in an accurate representation of fetal head station (calculated from the pelvic inlet), cervical dilatation, and fetal head position. It therefore can be concluded that the LaborPro provides a clinically and statistically adequate estimate of the fetal head station (calculated from the pelvic inlet), fetal head position, and cervical dilatation. The safety profile of the LaborPro non invasive system is also demonstrated by the non occurrence of any device related adverse event.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LaborPro, active Labor, Vaginal Examination
Labor Monitor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Labor Monitor
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Singleton pregnancy (as diagnosed by ultrasound)
* Cephalic presentation
Exclusion Criteria
* Positive HIV testing
* Positive Hepatitis B Surface Antigen testing
* Active Genital Herpes Simplex
* Coagulation disorders
* Fetal distress
* Inability to provide informed consent or comply with study protocol
* Abnormal placentation
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trig Medical Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Trigmedical
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLP 019/2008CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.