Standard Vs Adjusted Dosing of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Acute Renal Failure and Septic Shock

NCT ID: NCT00816790

Last Updated: 2015-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a large scale randomized controlled trial comparing standard and renally adjusted dosage of antibiotics in the septic shock patients with acute renal dysfunction. We will use Piperacillin as the prototype antibiotic in our study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Septic shock is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Early Goal Directed therapy, fluid resuscitation, use of vasopressors and/or inotropes, and appropriate empiric antibiotic administration remain the cornerstone of therapy in the treatment of septic shock. Despite aggressive interventions, the death rate from septic shock in North America remains as high as 50 percent.

Septic shock is defined as severe sepsis with hypotension not reversed by adequate fluid resuscitation. This state of distributive shock often results in hypo-perfusion of all major organ systems, including the kidneys, and is a common cause of multi-organ failure. Acute renal failure in the setting of septic shock often leads clinicians to adjust dosing of empiric antibiotics according to the apparent renal function. Renally adjusted antibiotic dosing in septic shock may be insufficient for several reasons. First, renal failure secondary to hypoperfusion often reverses following fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use, leading to subsequent under dosing. Second, a hypoperfusion state theoretically results in a reduction in the amount of antibiotic delivered to the site of infection. Lastly, for drugs with large volumes of distribution or prolonged half lives, large initial doses are required to quickly to achieve therapeutic concentrations.

To date, no studies have attempted to answer this important question by comparing standard doses to renally adjusted doses of empiric antibiotics in patients with both septic shock and renal dysfunction during the initial resuscitative period. Currently there is no uniform practice among clinicians with respect to antibiotic dosing, which reflects the paucity of evidence in this area. Some clinicians currently use full dosing of antibiotics in the setting of septic shock with acute renal failure while others adjust the dose based on renal function. Well designed, prospective, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the role of antibiotic adjustment during the resuscitative period of septic shock.

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a large scale randomized controlled trial comparing standard and renally adjusted dosage of antibiotics in the septic shock patients with acute renal dysfunction. We will use Tazocin as the prototype antibiotic in our study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock Acute Renal Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dose Adjusted

This arm will receive their broad spectrum antibiotic as an adjusted dose based on their renal function as measured when sepsis is diagnosed and antimicrobials are initiated

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Intervention Type DRUG

eGFR 20-40 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 3.375g IV q6h x 24 hours eGFR \< 20 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 2.25g IV q6h x 24 hours

Unadjusted Dose

This arm will receive their broad spectrum antibiotic as an unadjusted dose regardless of their renal function

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Intervention Type DRUG

Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5g IV q 6h x 24 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

eGFR 20-40 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 3.375g IV q6h x 24 hours eGFR \< 20 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 2.25g IV q6h x 24 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5g IV q 6h x 24 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tazocin Tazocin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with septic shock according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign
* Age \> 19
* Most recent eGFR\<40 mls/min

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant
* Known chronic renal failure patients who are dialysis dependant
* Administration of systemic antibiotics \> 1 dose
* Not expected to survive 28 days due to an underlying medical illness
* Allergy to Piperacillin/Tazobactam or any components of formulation within
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fraser Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sean Keenan

Intensivist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sean Keenan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fraser Health Authority

Matthew Wiens, BSc PharmD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Fraser Health Authority

Vincent Mabasa, BSc PharmD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Fraser Health Authority

Sanjiv Kangura, BSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Fraser Health Authority

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Columbian Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FHREB 2008-085

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tazocin Intervention Study
NCT00478855 COMPLETED PHASE4