Standard Vs Adjusted Dosing of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Acute Renal Failure and Septic Shock
NCT ID: NCT00816790
Last Updated: 2015-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PK of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults Undergoing ECMO
NCT03467854
PipEracillin/Tazobactam Versus mERoPENem for Treatment of AmpC Producing Blood Stream Infections
NCT05355350
Study of Intravenous Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Compared to Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
NCT01853982
Optimizing Dosing Regimen of Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Nosocomial Pneumonia
NCT01796717
Piperacillin as a Part of Antibiotic Streamlining in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT00177814
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Septic shock is defined as severe sepsis with hypotension not reversed by adequate fluid resuscitation. This state of distributive shock often results in hypo-perfusion of all major organ systems, including the kidneys, and is a common cause of multi-organ failure. Acute renal failure in the setting of septic shock often leads clinicians to adjust dosing of empiric antibiotics according to the apparent renal function. Renally adjusted antibiotic dosing in septic shock may be insufficient for several reasons. First, renal failure secondary to hypoperfusion often reverses following fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use, leading to subsequent under dosing. Second, a hypoperfusion state theoretically results in a reduction in the amount of antibiotic delivered to the site of infection. Lastly, for drugs with large volumes of distribution or prolonged half lives, large initial doses are required to quickly to achieve therapeutic concentrations.
To date, no studies have attempted to answer this important question by comparing standard doses to renally adjusted doses of empiric antibiotics in patients with both septic shock and renal dysfunction during the initial resuscitative period. Currently there is no uniform practice among clinicians with respect to antibiotic dosing, which reflects the paucity of evidence in this area. Some clinicians currently use full dosing of antibiotics in the setting of septic shock with acute renal failure while others adjust the dose based on renal function. Well designed, prospective, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the role of antibiotic adjustment during the resuscitative period of septic shock.
The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a large scale randomized controlled trial comparing standard and renally adjusted dosage of antibiotics in the septic shock patients with acute renal dysfunction. We will use Tazocin as the prototype antibiotic in our study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dose Adjusted
This arm will receive their broad spectrum antibiotic as an adjusted dose based on their renal function as measured when sepsis is diagnosed and antimicrobials are initiated
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
eGFR 20-40 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 3.375g IV q6h x 24 hours eGFR \< 20 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 2.25g IV q6h x 24 hours
Unadjusted Dose
This arm will receive their broad spectrum antibiotic as an unadjusted dose regardless of their renal function
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5g IV q 6h x 24 hours
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
eGFR 20-40 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 3.375g IV q6h x 24 hours eGFR \< 20 mls/min: Piperacillin/Tazobactam 2.25g IV q6h x 24 hours
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5g IV q 6h x 24 hours
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 19
* Most recent eGFR\<40 mls/min
Exclusion Criteria
* Known chronic renal failure patients who are dialysis dependant
* Administration of systemic antibiotics \> 1 dose
* Not expected to survive 28 days due to an underlying medical illness
* Allergy to Piperacillin/Tazobactam or any components of formulation within
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fraser Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sean Keenan
Intensivist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sean Keenan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fraser Health Authority
Matthew Wiens, BSc PharmD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Fraser Health Authority
Vincent Mabasa, BSc PharmD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Fraser Health Authority
Sanjiv Kangura, BSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Fraser Health Authority
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FHREB 2008-085
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.